THIS WAS EXTREMELY MISLEADING.
I WOULD LOVE FOR HIM -- I'M
GOING TO BE SENDING HIM A LETTER
TO HAVE HIM EXPLAIN HIMSELF, BUT
HE MADE A BALD STATEMENT THAT
DURING THE CAMPAIGN HE HAD NOT
MET WITH THE RUSSIANS.
THAT'S NOT TRUE.
WHETHER HE IN HIS HEAD THOUGHT
THAT HE WAS ANSWERING WHETHER HE
HAD TALKED TO ANY RUSSIANS ABOUT
THE CAMPAIGN, THEN HE SHOULD
HAVE SAID SO.
HE SHOULD HAVE SAID I MET WITH
THE RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR A COUPLE
TIMES, BUT WE DIDN'T DISCUSS THE
CAMPAIGN.
BUT THEN HIS OFFICE SHOULDN'T
COME OUT WITH AN EXPLANATION
SAYING HE TALKED WITH THE
RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR BUT DOESN'T
REMEMBER WHAT THEY TALKED ABOUT.
AND HE NEEDS TO EXPLAIN HIMSELF
HERE.
AND FOR HIM TO GET ON HIS HIGH
HORSE AND SAY I DON'T KNOW WHAT
ALL THIS IS ABOUT, I JUST ASKED
A QUESTION.
AND HE WAS THE ONE WHO OFFERED
THIS.
I DIDN'T ASK HIM HAVE YOU TALKED
TO ANY OF THE RUSSIANS DURING
THE CAMPAIGN.
I DIDN'T ASK HIM THAT.
I ASKED HIM, WHAT WOULD YOU DO
IF YOU LEARNED THAT MEMBERS OF
THE CAMPAIGN HAD MET WITH THE
RUSSIANS, HOPING HE'D SAY HE'D
RECUSE HIMSELF IN ANY
INVESTIGATION.
INSTEAD HE CHOSE TO ANSWER THE
WAY HE DID WHICH AGAIN, AS I