THE RIGHT-WING WANTS TO DESTROY THE MEDIA AND REPLACE IT WITH
THEIR PROPAGANDA, THEY DON'T BELIEVE IN FACTS.
THEY ATTACK
EVERYTHING THAT BRINGS FACTS.
MEDIA, PROFESSORS, SCIENTISTS,
ETC.
THOSE OF US ON THE LEFT TO ATTACK THE CORPORATE MEDIA DO SO
BECAUSE WE WANT TO MAKE IT BETTER, WE NEED MEDIA AND
OBJECTIVE FACT GATHERING.
THE GUYS ON THE RIGHT LIKE NICK
FUENTES DO NOT AGREE, HE IS ON A NETWORK IRONICALLY CALLED THE
RIGHT SIDE -- AGREE TO DISAGREE.
FIRST OF ALL HE TALKS ABOUT THE
FIRST AMENDMENT, GET A LOAD OF THIS KNUCKLEHEAD AND HIS
MISUNDERSTANDING OF WHAT AMERICA IS ABOUT.
THE FIRST AMENDMENT WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR MUSLIMS, BY THE WAY.
IT WASN'T WRITTEN FOR A BARBARIC IDEOLOGY THAT WANTED TO COME
OVER AND KILL US, IT WAS WRITTEN FOR CALVINISTS.
IT WAS WRITTEN
FOR LUTHERANS AND CATHOLICS, NOT FOR SALAFISTS, NOT FOR
WAHABBISTS, NOT FOR THE SAUDI ROYAL FAMILY, AND IT WAS
INTENDED FOR CITIZENS, NOT IMMIGRANTS.
IF THE FIRST
AMENDMENT PROTECTED EVERYONE'S RIGHT TO THEIR OWN RELIGION WE
WOULD HAVE OUR ARMY IN THE CONGO, FIGHTING AGAINST THE
LORD'S RESISTANCE ARMY.
I LOVE THE SMUGNESS WHILE SAYING HORRIFIC AND INCORRECT
THINGS.
I'M PRETTY SURE THE CONSTITUTION SAYS THE STATE IS
NOT ALLOWED TO ESTABLISH A RELIGION.
THAT WOULD MEAN IT'S
FOR ALL RELIGIONS AND NO RELIGIONS.
IN FACT THE FOUNDING
FATHERS HE SO SMUGLY AND INCORRECTLY QUOTES SAID THIS IS
IN NO WAY A CHRISTIAN NATION.
EVEN SAID IN THE TREATY OF
TRIPOLI THAT MUHAMMADEN -- AS THEY CALL THEM THEN -- ARE JUST
AS WELCOME HERE AS ANY RELIGION.
SO YOUR FACTS, UNSURPRISINGLY,
WRONG.
I WOULDN'T BOTHER WITH THAT STORY, A LOT OF RIGHT-WING
IDIOTS ARE COMPLETELY WRONG, THEY WANT A THEOLOGY, THEY ARE
THE AMERICAN TALIBAN, IF THEY COULD THEY WOULD RIP THE
CONSTITUTION APART AND PUT IN THEIR OWN FUN MEDALIST BELIEFS,
KIND OF LIKE SHARIA LAW, BUT THAT'S NOT WHY WE'RE DOING
THIS STORY.
WE ARE DOING IT BECAUSE WHAT HE SAID NEXT.
WE DON'T HEAR ABOUT IT IN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, OR ON FOX NEWS
BY THE WAY EITHER.
AND WHY NOT?
WHO RUNS THE MEDIA?
GLOBALISTS.
TIME TO KILL THE GLOBALISTS.
I DON'T WANT TO COME I DON'T WANT
TO NOT WATCH CNN OR HAVE THEM GO OUT OF BUSINESS, I DON'T WANT
CNN TO BE MORE HONEST -- I WANT PEOPLE THAT RUN CNN TO BE
ARRESTED AND DEPORTED OR HANGED.
SO, IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE RIGHT-WING AND THE
LEFT-WING?
YEAH, YOU BETCHA.
IRONICALLY, THIS IS WHAT THE
MAINSTREAM MEDIA GETS WRONG.
THEY CONSTANTLY DO NEUTRAL
RATHER THAN OBJECTIVE REPORTING.
OBJECTIVE REPORTING IS, THIS GUY
IS A NUT WHO DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE CONSTITUTION.
YOU DON'T HAVE
TO CALL HIM A NUT, LEAVE IT TO ME -- BUT YOU DO HAVE TO REPORT
THAT IT SAYS IN THE CONSTITUTION YOU SHOULD NOT ESTABLISH A
RELIGION, THAT'S NOT WHAT THE COUNTRY IS ABOUT, HE IS 100%
WRONG FACTUALLY.
BUT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA OFTEN GOES HE
SAID THIS AND SHE SAID THAT, REPUBLICANS SAY THIS, DEMOCRATS
SAY THAT.
WHO KNOWS WHO IS RIGHT?
THE LEFT-WING SAYS WE
SHOULD MAKE THE MEDIA BETTER, THE RIGHT-WING SAYS THEY SHOULD
BE MURDERED.
WE DON'T KNOW WHO IS RIGHT AND WHO IS WRONG.
NICK
FUENTES IS WRONG.
WE DON'T TALK ABOUT KILLING THEM, THAT'S WHERE
WE DRAW THE LINE.
THE CEO OF RIGHT SIDE NETWORK SAID IT HAS
COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT ONE OF OUR HOSTS MADE SOME
INAPPROPRIATE COMMENTS REGARDING CNN AND OTHERS ON ONE OF HIS
SHOWS EARLIER THIS WEEK.
THAT WE BELIEVE NICK'S COMMENTS WERE
MADE IN JEST -- DIDN'T LOOK LIKE HE WAS JOKING?
-- THEY ARE
UNACCEPTABLE AND INAPPROPRIATE.
WE ARE CURRENTLY REVIEWING THE MATTER AND WILL HANDLE IT
INTERNALLY.
TO GIVE YOU A FURTHER SENSE THAT HE WASN'T JOKING, HIS
PRODUCERS LATER RETWEETED SOMEONE CONGRATULATING HIM FOR
THOSE COMMENTS.
OOPS.
AND THEN WHEN THEY REALIZED HE COULD GET
FIRED FROM THIS NONEXISTENT NETWORK, WHOEVER THESE FOLKS
ARE, THEY PANICKED AND DELETED THE TWEET.
YOU KNOW, WE CAN SEE
THE DELETED TWEETS.
I DON'T THINK THE RIGHT-WING HAS CAUGHT
ON TO THAT, THEY AREN'T VERY GOOD WITH TECHNOLOGY.
SO YES,
MAINSTREAM MEDIA, THERE IS A GIANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO
SIDES.
I KNOW THAT OFTENTIMES YOU DON'T BELIEVE US BUT WE ARE
ACTUALLY TRYING TO MAKE YOU BETTER.
YOU MIGHT FIND THAT
SMUG OR PATRONIZING, BUT I GIVE WHAT I HOPE IS A CONSTRUCTIVE
CRITIQUE, SAYING HERE IS WHAT'S WRONG AND HERE IS HOPEFULLY A
SMART AND REASONABLE, OBJECTIVE WAY OF FIXING IT.
WHEREAS THESE
NUTJOBS HAVE NO GOOD INTENTIONS TOWARD YOU.
THEY DON'T BELIEVE
IN DEMOCRACY, THEY WOULD RIP THE PRESS APART AND OUR GOVERNMENT
AND ARE SECULAR WAY OF DOING THINGS COMPLETELY APART.
THAT'S
NOT WHO THEY ARE, THEY ARE FUNDAMENTALISTS, AND
FUNDAMENTALISTS ARE DRIVEN BY DIFFERENT INTENTIONS ALTOGETHER.