BLOG.
FOXNEWS IS ERIC BOLLING, THE FIVE AND HE HAS ANOTHER SHOW ON FOX
NEWS NETWORK, HE IS SUING THE REPUBLIC OR THE REPORTER WHO
OUTED HIS PP PICS.
14 SOURCES SAYING THAT ERIC BOLLING SENT PICTURES OF
MALE GENITALS TO FEMALE COWORKERS.
THE REPORTER TWEETED AFTER THE STORIES CAME OUT, TWEETED THIS
SAYING JUST RECEIVED A SUMMONS.
ERIC BOLLING IS SUING ME FOR DEFAMATION
ñ $50 MILLION IN DAMAGES.
I STAND BY MY REPORTING AND WILL PROTECT MY SOURCES.
HE CONTINUED SAYING NOT GOING TO STOP REPORTING ON ERIC
BOLLING OR ANYONE ELSE.
I'VE HAD FAMILY MEMBERS KILLED AND JAILED IN IRAN, A
LAWSUIT ISN'T GOING TO SCARE ME.
BOLLING RESPONDED AFTERWORD, I WILL CONTINUE TO FIGHT
AGAINST THESE FALSE MERE ATTACKS.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT.
I JUST WANT TO QUICKLY GO BACK TO PICTURES OF THE
PENIS AND WHETHER OR NOT IT BELONGED TO BOLLING.
I WOULD ARGUE IT WOULD BE WORSE IF BOLLING IS SENDING
GENITALIA PICTURES THAT BELONG TO OTHER MEN'S OF THESE WOMEN.
CITY TAKE THOSE PICTURES?
I DON'T KNOW IF THAT MAKES IT BETTER BUT ANYWAY I JUST
WANTED TO COMMENT ON THAT.
THE THING, WHEN YOU FIND, ERIC BOLLING, BIG GUY, HE
MIGHT NOT HAVE AN EQUALLY BIG WHATEVER.
MAYBE HE WANTS TO IMPRESS HIS COWORKERS WITH THE
GENTLEMANLY TAKE PIC.
MAYBE GOES ONLINE AND HE SEARCHES FOR BIGGER ONES
AND SENDS THEM AND PASSES THEM OFF AS HIS OWN.
IT IS DEFINITELY WORSE.
I THINK IT WOULD BE HILARIOUS.
ALSO MAYBE HE COULD DENY LATER THAT THEY WERE HIS IF A
MICHAEL JACKSON GENITALIA INVESTIGATION WOULD TAKE PLACE.
WE SHOULD DO A POLL ON THIS.
WHAT IS WORSE?
IF YOU SEND A PICTURE OF HIS OWN PENIS, WAS EMBARRASSED BY
HIS OWN PENIS AND SEARCH THE INTERNET FOR A LARGER ONE,
OR IF HE WENT TO A COWORKER OR FRIEND AND WAS LIKE, CAN I
BORROW YOURS?
WOW.
WHAT SIZE SHOE DO YOU WEAR?
16?
HE DIDN'T GO TO TRUMPET.
LOOK, IF ERIC BOLLING IS SERIOUS AND THINKS SURE, HE MADE UP
14 SOURCES.
HAVE ADDED THAT HE WILL SEE YOU IN COURT AND FROM MY POINT
OF VIEW, I AM NOT A LEAD, BUT I WOULD LOOK FORWARD TO IT
BECAUSE THEN WE MIGHT GET TO FIND OUT WHO THE 14
SOURCES ARE THEY MIGHT GET TO TELL YOU A LOT MORE DETAILS.
I DON'T THINK THAT IS GOING TO WORK OUT FOR YOU.
ERIC'S STRATEGY HERE IS A VERY BAD SHORTAGE HE
BECAUSE I DON'T THINK THAT ALI MADE THE STORY UP.
I DON'T THINK HE IS A BAD GUY WHO JUST WANTS TO SMEAR BOLLING.
I THINK HE ACTUALLY HAS EVIDENCE TO BACK UP HIS CLAIMS SO IF
IT DOES GO TO COURT, THE EVIDENCE NEEDS TO BE PRESENTED.
I DON'T KNOW.
THERE ARE TWO REASONS WHY HE DOES IT BECAUSE HE MIGHT
THEY, WHY IN THE WORLD WHAT HE DO SUCH A BONEHEADED THING?
WELL, HE'S THE GUY WHO ALLEGEDLY SAID THE PICTURES IN THE
FIRST PLACE.
ONE IS, IT IS A TRUMP MOVE.
YOU USE THREATS OF GIANT LAWSUITS TO INTIMIDATE PEOPLE.
HE DIDN'T SUE HIM YET, HE IS JUST THREATENING THE SUE HIM.
TRUMP DURING THE CAMPAIGN THREATENED TO DO IT.
HE NEVER ACTUALLY DID ADVISE THE SAME LAWYER THAT TRUMP USED
TO THREATEN THE NEW YORK TIMES WITH A LAWSUIT IS THE SAME
LAWYER THAT ERIC BOLLING IS USING TO THREATEN.
THEY'RE NOT THREATENING HUFFINGTON POST THAT
PUBLISHED THE STORY, THEY ARE ONLY THREATENING THE
WRITERS BECAUSE THEY THINK OF IT IMPOSED AS A GIANT COMPANY
AND THEY HAVE THE RESOURCES TO FIGHT BACK WHEREAS WE MIGHT
BE ABLE TO THE INS ABLE TO INTIMIDATE THIS YOUNG REPORTER.
IT IS SUCH A CLASSIC SCUMMY TRUMP KIND OF MOVE.
IT DOESN'T MEAN HE IS ACTUALLY GOING TO GO THROUGH WITH IT
BECAUSE YOU MIGHT WANT TO TRY TO INTIMIDATE HIM OUT OF IT.
THAT DIDN'T WORK?
NEVERMIND ABOUT THAT LAWSUIT.
ABSOLUTELY, THE HAS TO BE WHAT IS.
THE REPORTER, I LOVE THE RESPONSE.
I'VE SEEN WORSE.
I HAVE SEEN WORSE IN MY LIFE THEN ERIC BOLLING TRYING TO
SUE ME FOR $50 MILLION.
NOT GOING AFTER HUFFINGTON POST IS ABSOLUTELY AN
INTIMIDATION TACTIC.
IN THIS CASE, HE HAS SEEN WORSE BECAUSE HE PROBABLY
SAW THE PICTURES.