Richard Dawkins: A.I. Might Run the World Better Than Humans Do

When we come to artificial intelligence and the possibility of their becoming conscious
we reach a profound philosophical difficulty.
I am a philosophical naturalist.
I am committed to the view that there’s nothing in our brains that violates the laws
of physics, there’s nothing that could not in principle be reproduced in technology.
It hasn’t been done yet, we’re probably quite a long way away from it, but I see no
reason why in the future we shouldn’t reach the point where a human made robot is capable
of consciousness and of feeling pain.
We can feel pain, why shouldn’t they?
And this is profoundly disturbing because it kind of goes against the grain to think
that a machine made of metal and silicon chips could feel pain, but I don’t see why they
would not.
And so this moral consideration of how to treat artificially intelligent robots will
arise in the future, and it’s a problem which philosophers and moral philosophers
are already talking about.
Once again, I’m committed to the view that this is possible.
I’m committed to the view that anything that a human brain can do can be replicated
in silicon.
And so I’m sympathetic to the misgivings that have been expressed by highly respected
figures like Elon Musk and Steven Hawking that we ought to be worried that on the precautionary
principle we should worry about a takeover perhaps even by robots by our own creation,
especially if they reproduce themselves and potentially even evolve by reproduction and
don’t need us anymore.
This is a science-fiction speculation at the moment, but I think philosophically I’m
committed to the view that it is possible, and like any major advance we need to apply
the precautionary principle and ask ourselves what the consequences might be.
It could be said that the sum of not human happiness but the sum of sentient-being happiness
might be improved, they might make a better job do a better job of running the world than
we are, certainly that we are at present, and so perhaps it might not be a bad thing
if we went extinct.
And our civilization, the memory of Shakespeare and Beethoven and Michelangelo persisted in
silicon rather than in brains and our form of life.
And one could foresee a future time when silicon beings look back on a dawn age when the earth
was peopled by soft squishy watery organic beings and who knows that might be better,
but we’re really in the science fiction territory now.
5 Future Predictions For The Human Race Richard Dawkins: Science in the Soul | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO) AI, Intelligent, Origins of Life, Life in the Universe - Richard Dawkins vs Neil deGrasse Tyson Richard Dawkins exploding at bullshit in the Bible Artificial Intelligence Is NOT what you think it is. Super Elements BBC Documentary 2017 Rare Earth Metals Documentary Super Materials Train Your Brain: Mindfulness Meditation for Anxiety, Depression, ADD and PTSD | Daniel Goleman Does the universe have a purpose or meaning | Michio Kaku vs Richard Dawkins Debate Richard Dawkins demonstrates the evolution of the eye 4 Professional Poker Lessons to Help You Think Clearly and Live Wisely | Liv Boeree

Richard Dawkins: A.I. Might Run the World Better Than Humans Do

Latest Posts