Full Himes Interview: 'We've seen a lot of contact' between Russia and Trump Campaign

DONALD TRUMP JR. TRIED TO CLAIM ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE OF HIS CONVERSATION BETWEEN HIM AND
ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE OF HIS
CONVERSATION BETWEEN HIM AND
DONALD TRUMP.
CONVERSATION BETWEEN HIM AND
DONALD TRUMP.
IT IS QUITE A LOT TO UNPACK.
DONALD TRUMP.
IT IS QUITE A LOT TO UNPACK.
JOINING ME NOW IS A MEMBER OF
IT IS QUITE A LOT TO UNPACK.
JOINING ME NOW IS A MEMBER OF
THE HOUSE COMMITTEE, IS JIM
JOINING ME NOW IS A MEMBER OF
THE HOUSE COMMITTEE, IS JIM
HEYES OF CONNECTICUT.
THE HOUSE COMMITTEE, IS JIM
HEYES OF CONNECTICUT.
WET COME.
HEYES OF CONNECTICUT.
WET COME.
>> THANK YOU, TODD.
WET COME.
>> THANK YOU, TODD.
LET ME START WITH SOME SEVEN OR
>> THANK YOU, TODD.
LET ME START WITH SOME SEVEN OR
EIGHT HOURS, JUST CHARACTERIZE
LET ME START WITH SOME SEVEN OR
EIGHT HOURS, JUST CHARACTERIZE
DONALD TRUMP JR. IS
EIGHT HOURS, JUST CHARACTERIZE
DONALD TRUMP JR. IS
FORTHCOMING.
DONALD TRUMP JR. IS
FORTHCOMING.
WOULD YOU DESCRIBE IT IS FOURTH
FORTHCOMING.
WOULD YOU DESCRIBE IT IS FOURTH
COMING.
WOULD YOU DESCRIBE IT IS FOURTH
COMING.
THERE WAS THE ONE EPISODE THATS
COMING.
THERE WAS THE ONE EPISODE THATS
TALKED ABOUT SINCE THAT
THERE WAS THE ONE EPISODE THATS
TALKED ABOUT SINCE THAT
INTERVIEW WHERE HE DECLINED TO
TALKED ABOUT SINCE THAT
INTERVIEW WHERE HE DECLINED TO
ANSWER QUESTIONS OF THE
INTERVIEW WHERE HE DECLINED TO
ANSWER QUESTIONS OF THE
CONVERSATIONS THAT HE HAD WITH
ANSWER QUESTIONS OF THE
CONVERSATIONS THAT HE HAD WITH
HIS FATHER THATS RELEVANT OF
CONVERSATIONS THAT HE HAD WITH
HIS FATHER THATS RELEVANT OF
THE DON JR. MEETING AT TRUMP
HIS FATHER THATS RELEVANT OF
THE DON JR. MEETING AT TRUMP
TOWER AND PART OF THAT I WOULD
THE DON JR. MEETING AT TRUMP
TOWER AND PART OF THAT I WOULD
SAY HES FORTHCOMING.
TOWER AND PART OF THAT I WOULD
SAY HES FORTHCOMING.
WAS IT A CONVERSATION THAT HE
SAY HES FORTHCOMING.
WAS IT A CONVERSATION THAT HE
HAD AFTER THE MEETING ITSELF OR
WAS IT A CONVERSATION THAT HE
HAD AFTER THE MEETING ITSELF OR
A CONVERSATION HE HAD WITH HIS
HAD AFTER THE MEETING ITSELF OR
A CONVERSATION HE HAD WITH HIS
FATHER TRYING TO SPIN THE
A CONVERSATION HE HAD WITH HIS
FATHER TRYING TO SPIN THE
DISCLOSURE OF THE MEETING.
FATHER TRYING TO SPIN THE
DISCLOSURE OF THE MEETING.
WE DID NOT GET TO HEAR THE
DISCLOSURE OF THE MEETING.
WE DID NOT GET TO HEAR THE
CONTENT OR WE DONT KNOW.
WE DID NOT GET TO HEAR THE
CONTENT OR WE DONT KNOW.
I AM NOT A LAWYER MYSELF.
CONTENT OR WE DONT KNOW.
I AM NOT A LAWYER MYSELF.
EVERY LAWYER I KNOW SAYS THERE
I AM NOT A LAWYER MYSELF.
EVERY LAWYER I KNOW SAYS THERE
IS NO ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
EVERY LAWYER I KNOW SAYS THERE
IS NO ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
THIS IS NOT A COURT OF LAW WHERE
IS NO ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
THIS IS NOT A COURT OF LAW WHERE
THE JUDGE WOULD SAY NO, THATS
THIS IS NOT A COURT OF LAW WHERE
THE JUDGE WOULD SAY NO, THATS
INSUFFICIENT.
THE JUDGE WOULD SAY NO, THATS
INSUFFICIENT.
YOU DONT HAVE THE ABILITY THAT
INSUFFICIENT.
YOU DONT HAVE THE ABILITY THAT
HES NOT GOING TO ANSWER.
YOU DONT HAVE THE ABILITY THAT
HES NOT GOING TO ANSWER.
WAS THERE ANY WAY TRYING TO
HES NOT GOING TO ANSWER.
WAS THERE ANY WAY TRYING TO
FORCE HIM TO ANSWER THE QUESTION
WAS THERE ANY WAY TRYING TO
FORCE HIM TO ANSWER THE QUESTION
AND YOU HAVE THE POWER TO COMPEL
FORCE HIM TO ANSWER THE QUESTION
AND YOU HAVE THE POWER TO COMPEL
HIM.
AND YOU HAVE THE POWER TO COMPEL
HIM.
>> CONGRESS IN ITS INVESTIGATION
HIM.
>> CONGRESS IN ITS INVESTIGATION
DOES NOT NEED TO ACKNOWLEDGE ANY
>> CONGRESS IN ITS INVESTIGATION
DOES NOT NEED TO ACKNOWLEDGE ANY
PRIVILEGE INCLUDING
DOES NOT NEED TO ACKNOWLEDGE ANY
PRIVILEGE INCLUDING
ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
PRIVILEGE INCLUDING
ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
THE CHAIRMAN WAS DOING A
ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
THE CHAIRMAN WAS DOING A
TERRIFIC AND FAIR JOB HAD SAID
(áR&Y, WE ARE NOT GOING
THE CHAIRMAN WAS DOING A
TERRIFIC AND FAIR JOB HAD SAID
(áR&Y, WE ARE NOT GOING
COMPEL.
COMPEL.
WE NEED TO SUBPOENA HIM.(3ttY %
COMPEL.
WE NEED TO SUBPOENA HIM.(3ttY %
>> IS THERE A PROCESS TO COMPEL
WE NEED TO SUBPOENA HIM.(3ttY %
>> IS THERE A PROCESS TO COMPEL
AND TESTIFY IT IS NOT
>> IS THERE A PROCESS TO COMPEL
AND TESTIFY IT IS NOT
SUBPOENAED.
AND TESTIFY IT IS NOT
SUBPOENAED.
>> MAYBE.
SUBPOENAED.
>> MAYBE.
IF YOU ARE HERE INVOLUNTARILY,
>> MAYBE.
IF YOU ARE HERE INVOLUNTARILY,
WE ARE NOT GOING TO FORCE YOU TO
IF YOU ARE HERE INVOLUNTARILY,
WE ARE NOT GOING TO FORCE YOU TO
ANSWER QUESTIONS.
WE ARE NOT GOING TO FORCE YOU TO
ANSWER QUESTIONS.
>> I AM CURIOUScy[K■ AND THERE I
ANSWER QUESTIONS.
>> I AM CURIOUScy[K■ AND THERE I
DECEMBER
>> I AM CURIOUScy[K■ AND THERE I
DECEMBER
DISCUSSION.
DECEMBER
DISCUSSION.
THERE WERE SOME REPORTING THAT
DISCUSSION.
THERE WERE SOME REPORTING THAT
THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF HELPED
THERE WERE SOME REPORTING THAT
THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF HELPED
DRAFT THE INITIAL STATEMENT BY
THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF HELPED
DRAFT THE INITIAL STATEMENT BY
HIS SON AND HERE IS WHAT THE
DRAFT THE INITIAL STATEMENT BY
HIS SON AND HERE IS WHAT THE
PRESIDENTS LAWYER SAID TO ME IN
HIS SON AND HERE IS WHAT THE
PRESIDENTS LAWYER SAID TO ME IN
JULY ON THIS ISSUE.
PRESIDENTS LAWYER SAID TO ME IN
JULY ON THIS ISSUE.
>> THE PRESIDENT WAS NO TT
JULY ON THIS ISSUE.
>> THE PRESIDENT WAS NO TT
INVOLVED IN THE DRAFTING AND
>> THE PRESIDENT WAS NO TT
INVOLVED IN THE DRAFTING AND
CAME FROM DONALD TRUMP JR.
INVOLVED IN THE DRAFTING AND
CAME FROM DONALD TRUMP JR.
THATS WHAT I CAN TELL YOU
CAME FROM DONALD TRUMP JR.
THATS WHAT I CAN TELL YOU
BECAUSE THATS WHAT WE KNOW.
THATS WHAT I CAN TELL YOU
BECAUSE THATS WHAT WE KNOW.
AGAIN, DONALD TRUMP JR. SAID
BECAUSE THATS WHAT WE KNOW.
AGAIN, DONALD TRUMP JR. SAID
THE SAME THING THAT IT WAS IN
AGAIN, DONALD TRUMP JR. SAID
THE SAME THING THAT IT WAS IN
FACT FROM HIM.
THE SAME THING THAT IT WAS IN
FACT FROM HIM.
>> DOES THAT STATEMENT HOLDUP
FACT FROM HIM.
>> DOES THAT STATEMENT HOLDUP
BASED ON YOUR QUESTION ON DONALD
>> DOES THAT STATEMENT HOLDUP
BASED ON YOUR QUESTION ON DONALD
TRUMP.
BASED ON YOUR QUESTION ON DONALD
TRUMP.
>> BECAUSE OF THE SORT OF NOVEL
TRUMP.
>> BECAUSE OF THE SORT OF NOVEL
CLAIM OF PRIVILEGE, WE DONT
>> BECAUSE OF THE SORT OF NOVEL
CLAIM OF PRIVILEGE, WE DONT
KNOW WHAT HAPPENED IN THE
CLAIM OF PRIVILEGE, WE DONT
KNOW WHAT HAPPENED IN THE
CONVERSATION.
KNOW WHAT HAPPENED IN THE
CONVERSATION.
>> HE USED THE PRIVILEGE CLAIM
CONVERSATION.
>> HE USED THE PRIVILEGE CLAIM
TO NOT DESCRIBE ANY CONVERSATION
>> HE USED THE PRIVILEGE CLAIM
TO NOT DESCRIBE ANY CONVERSATION
HE HAD WITH HIS FATHER, PERIOD?
TO NOT DESCRIBE ANY CONVERSATION
HE HAD WITH HIS FATHER, PERIOD?
>> JUST THIS PARTICULAR
HE HAD WITH HIS FATHER, PERIOD?
>> JUST THIS PARTICULAR
CONVERSATION.
>> JUST THIS PARTICULAR
CONVERSATION.
WHY DECIDE THAT YOU ARE NOT
CONVERSATION.
WHY DECIDE THAT YOU ARE NOT
GOING TO TALK ABOUT THAT
WHY DECIDE THAT YOU ARE NOT
GOING TO TALK ABOUT THAT
PARTICULAR CONVERSATION.
GOING TO TALK ABOUT THAT
PARTICULAR CONVERSATION.
THIS IS A PREVAILING TEAMHEME OF
PARTICULAR CONVERSATION.
THIS IS A PREVAILING TEAMHEME OF
THE INVESTIGATION.
THIS IS A PREVAILING TEAMHEME OF
THE INVESTIGATION.
THERE ARE THINGS THAT ARE LIED
THE INVESTIGATION.
THERE ARE THINGS THAT ARE LIED
ABOUT THAT ARE FORGOTTEN AND YOU
THERE ARE THINGS THAT ARE LIED
ABOUT THAT ARE FORGOTTEN AND YOU
HAVE TO ASK YOURSELF WHY WOULD
ABOUT THAT ARE FORGOTTEN AND YOU
HAVE TO ASK YOURSELF WHY WOULD
HE SEEK TO PROTECT THAT
HAVE TO ASK YOURSELF WHY WOULD
HE SEEK TO PROTECT THAT
PARTICULAR CONVERSATION.
HE SEEK TO PROTECT THAT
PARTICULAR CONVERSATION.
OBVIOUSLY, MAKES THE
PARTICULAR CONVERSATION.
OBVIOUSLY, MAKES THE
INVESTIGATION THAT MUCH MORE
OBVIOUSLY, MAKES THE
INVESTIGATION THAT MUCH MORE
CURIOUS OF THE CONTEXT.
INVESTIGATION THAT MUCH MORE
CURIOUS OF THE CONTEXT.
THE RUSSIAN LAWYER THAT WAS
CURIOUS OF THE CONTEXT.
THE RUSSIAN LAWYER THAT WAS
APART OF THE MEETING TESTIFIED,
THE RUSSIAN LAWYER THAT WAS
APART OF THE MEETING TESTIFIED,
SHE SEEMS TO THE THAT ALL DONALD
APART OF THE MEETING TESTIFIED,
SHE SEEMS TO THE THAT ALL DONALD
TRUMP JR. CARED ABOUT WAS --
SHE SEEMS TO THE THAT ALL DONALD
TRUMP JR. CARED ABOUT WAS --
>> WE GOTTEN FOUROF FOUR ACCOUNT
TRUMP JR. CARED ABOUT WAS --
>> WE GOTTEN FOUROF FOUR ACCOUNT
WHAT HAPPENED IN THAT ROOM WHO
>> WE GOTTEN FOUROF FOUR ACCOUNT
WHAT HAPPENED IN THAT ROOM WHO
WERE IN THE ROOM.
WHAT HAPPENED IN THAT ROOM WHO
WERE IN THE ROOM.
THE STORIES MATCHED UP
WERE IN THE ROOM.
THE STORIES MATCHED UP
CONSISTENTLY, YES, DONALD TRUMP
THE STORIES MATCHED UP
CONSISTENTLY, YES, DONALD TRUMP
JR. WAS NOT INTERESTED IN
CONSISTENTLY, YES, DONALD TRUMP
JR. WAS NOT INTERESTED IN
ADOPTION, HE WAS INTERESTED IN
JR. WAS NOT INTERESTED IN
ADOPTION, HE WAS INTERESTED IN
THE E-MAIL THAT HE RELEASED IN
ADOPTION, HE WAS INTERESTED IN
THE E-MAIL THAT HE RELEASED IN
FIEPD
THE E-MAIL THAT HE RELEASED IN
FIEPD
FINDING OUT IF THERE IS DIRT.
FIEPD
FINDING OUT IF THERE IS DIRT.
THE QUESTION WAS WHAT HAPPENED
FINDING OUT IF THERE IS DIRT.
THE QUESTION WAS WHAT HAPPENED
AFTERWARDS.
THE QUESTION WAS WHAT HAPPENED
AFTERWARDS.
WAS DIRT CONVEYED AND WE HAVE
AFTERWARDS.
WAS DIRT CONVEYED AND WE HAVE
SEEN A LOT OF CONTACT AND A
WAS DIRT CONVEYED AND WE HAVE
SEEN A LOT OF CONTACT AND A
DESIRE TO GET DIRT AND WORK WITH
SEEN A LOT OF CONTACT AND A
DESIRE TO GET DIRT AND WORK WITH
THE RUSSIAN AND A DESIRE TO
DESIRE TO GET DIRT AND WORK WITH
THE RUSSIAN AND A DESIRE TO
CONTACT THE RUSSIANS.
THE RUSSIAN AND A DESIRE TO
CONTACT THE RUSSIANS.
WAS THERE SOME FORM.
CONTACT THE RUSSIANS.
WAS THERE SOME FORM.
THERE IS A QUESTION, WAS THERE
WAS THERE SOME FORM.
THERE IS A QUESTION, WAS THERE
COOPERATION.
THERE IS A QUESTION, WAS THERE
COOPERATION.
>> DID THE RUSSIAN LAWYER ADMIT
COOPERATION.
>> DID THE RUSSIAN LAWYER ADMIT
THAT SHE WAS COMING ON BEHALF OF
>> DID THE RUSSIAN LAWYER ADMIT
THAT SHE WAS COMING ON BEHALF OF
THE RUSSIANS TO TALK ABOUT
THAT SHE WAS COMING ON BEHALF OF
THE RUSSIANS TO TALK ABOUT
SANCTIONS?
THE RUSSIANS TO TALK ABOUT
SANCTIONS?
>> IT IS UNCLEAR OF WHOS DOING
SANCTIONS?
>> IT IS UNCLEAR OF WHOS DOING
TO WHOM IN THAT ROOM.
>> IT IS UNCLEAR OF WHOS DOING
TO WHOM IN THAT ROOM.
MY SENSE IS THAT WAS HER
TO WHOM IN THAT ROOM.
MY SENSE IS THAT WAS HER
INTEREST.
MY SENSE IS THAT WAS HER
INTEREST.
MR. GOLDSTONE GOT THIS THING
INTEREST.
MR. GOLDSTONE GOT THIS THING
ROLLING.
MR. GOLDSTONE GOT THIS THING
ROLLING.
WE HAVE YET TO INTERVIEW ROB
ROLLING.
WE HAVE YET TO INTERVIEW ROB
GOLDSTONE.
WE HAVE YET TO INTERVIEW ROB
GOLDSTONE.
OBVIOUSLY, THATS GOING TO BE AN
GOLDSTONE.
OBVIOUSLY, THATS GOING TO BE AN
INTERESTING INTERVIEW.
OBVIOUSLY, THATS GOING TO BE AN
INTERESTING INTERVIEW.
>> WHAT THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT
INTERESTING INTERVIEW.
>> WHAT THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT
WAS TRYING TO MAKE CONTACT.
>> WHAT THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT
WAS TRYING TO MAKE CONTACT.
>> THE QUESTION GOT ASKED.?4
WAS TRYING TO MAKE CONTACT.
>> THE QUESTION GOT ASKED.?4
WE GOT A SIMILAR ANSWER TO
>> THE QUESTION GOT ASKED.?4
WE GOT A SIMILAR ANSWER TO
ANSWERS OF OTHER ODD BEHAVIOR
WE GOT A SIMILAR ANSWER TO
ANSWERS OF OTHER ODD BEHAVIOR
WITH JARED KUSHNERWY■ THATS KNO
M=w
ANSWERS OF OTHER ODD BEHAVIOR
WITH JARED KUSHNERWY■ THATS KNO
M=w
HE SAW A BACK CHANNEL PERHAPS AT
HE SAW A BACK CHANNEL PERHAPS AT
THE RUSSIAN EMBASSY.
HE SAW A BACK CHANNEL PERHAPS AT
THE RUSSIAN EMBASSY.
AGAIN, WAS IT THAT ODD?
THE RUSSIAN EMBASSY.
AGAIN, WAS IT THAT ODD?
THE ANSWER THAT WE GOT IS HEY,
AGAIN, WAS IT THAT ODD?
THE ANSWER THAT WE GOT IS HEY,
WE WERE REALLY BUSY AND WELL
THE ANSWER THAT WE GOT IS HEY,
WE WERE REALLY BUSY AND WELL
THROW IT OUT THERE TO SEE WITH
WE WERE REALLY BUSY AND WELL
THROW IT OUT THERE TO SEE WITH
DON JR. WITH RESPECTED
THROW IT OUT THERE TO SEE WITH
DON JR. WITH RESPECTED
INFORMATION.
DON JR. WITH RESPECTED
INFORMATION.
IT IS NOT ILLEGAL TO LISTEN.
INFORMATION.
IT IS NOT ILLEGAL TO LISTEN.
SO DOWN PLAYING THESE THINGS.
IT IS NOT ILLEGAL TO LISTEN.
SO DOWN PLAYING THESE THINGS.
>> THE SCOPE OFP YOUR
SO DOWN PLAYING THESE THINGS.
>> THE SCOPE OFP YOUR
INVESTIGATION RIGHTmÑ NOW, DONAL
>> THE SCOPE OFP YOUR
INVESTIGATION RIGHTmÑ NOW, DONAL
TRUMP JR. ONCE TALKED ABOUT■ A
INVESTIGATION RIGHTmÑ NOW, DONAL
TRUMP JR. ONCE TALKED ABOUT■ A
BRAGGED ABOUT HOW MUCH RUSSIAN
TRUMP JR. ONCE TALKED ABOUT■ A
BRAGGED ABOUT HOW MUCH RUSSIAN
MONEY WAS IMPORTANT TO THE REAL
BRAGGED ABOUT HOW MUCH RUSSIAN
MONEY WAS IMPORTANT TO THE REAL
ESTATE EMPIRE.
MONEY WAS IMPORTANT TO THE REAL
ESTATE EMPIRE.
HE SAID IT BACK IN 2008.
ESTATE EMPIRE.
HE SAID IT BACK IN 2008.
THE SCOPE OF YOUR INVESTIGATION
HE SAID IT BACK IN 2008.
THE SCOPE OF YOUR INVESTIGATION
WHEN IT COMES TO FINANCES, HOW
THE SCOPE OF YOUR INVESTIGATION
WHEN IT COMES TO FINANCES, HOW
FAR DID IT GO BACK?
WHEN IT COMES TO FINANCES, HOW
FAR DID IT GO BACK?
>> IT GOES BACK TO 2008.
FAR DID IT GO BACK?
>> IT GOES BACK TO 2008.
ROBERT MUELLER AND OTHERS CAN
>> IT GOES BACK TO 2008.
ROBERT MUELLER AND OTHERS CAN
LOOK INTO THE KIND OF THINGS
ROBERT MUELLER AND OTHERS CAN
LOOK INTO THE KIND OF THINGS
THEY LOOK INTO OF PAUL MANAFORT
LOOK INTO THE KIND OF THINGS
THEY LOOK INTO OF PAUL MANAFORT
AND HES CHARGED WITH MONEY
THEY LOOK INTO OF PAUL MANAFORT
AND HES CHARGED WITH MONEY
LAUNDERING AND ALL SORTS OF
AND HES CHARGED WITH MONEY
LAUNDERING AND ALL SORTS OF
THINGS THAT ARE NOT APART OF THE
LAUNDERING AND ALL SORTS OF
THINGS THAT ARE NOT APART OF THE
CONGRESSIONAL.
THINGS THAT ARE NOT APART OF THE
CONGRESSIONAL.
OUR JOB IS TO FIGURE OUT WHAT
CONGRESSIONAL.
OUR JOB IS TO FIGURE OUT WHAT
HAPPENED WITH THE HACK AND
OUR JOB IS TO FIGURE OUT WHAT
HAPPENED WITH THE HACK AND
WHETHER THERE WAS COOPERATIONS
HAPPENED WITH THE HACK AND
WHETHER THERE WAS COOPERATIONS
OR LEAKS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT
WHETHER THERE WAS COOPERATIONS
OR LEAKS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT
AND CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES IS MUCH
OR LEAKS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT
AND CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES IS MUCH
MORE IN THE REALM OF WHAT
AND CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES IS MUCH
MORE IN THE REALM OF WHAT
MUELLER IS DOING.
MORE IN THE REALM OF WHAT
MUELLER IS DOING.
>> YOU JUST KEEP PHRASE OF THE
MUELLER IS DOING.
>> YOU JUST KEEP PHRASE OF THE
ACTING REPUBLICAN HEAD OF THE
>> YOU JUST KEEP PHRASE OF THE
ACTING REPUBLICAN HEAD OF THE
HOUSE OF THE INTELLIGENCE
ACTING REPUBLICAN HEAD OF THE
HOUSE OF THE INTELLIGENCE
COMMITTEE, THE ARKANSAS
HOUSE OF THE INTELLIGENCE
COMMITTEE, THE ARKANSAS
CONGRESSMAN, MIKE CONWAY.
COMMITTEE, THE ARKANSAS
CONGRESSMAN, MIKE CONWAY.
DEVIN
CONGRESSMAN, MIKE CONWAY.
DEVIN
DEVIN NUNEZ HAVE BEEN CLEARED
DEVIN
DEVIN NUNEZ HAVE BEEN CLEARED
WITH ETHICS VIOLATION AND CAN HE
DEVIN NUNEZ HAVE BEEN CLEARED
WITH ETHICS VIOLATION AND CAN HE
UNWHINE HIS RECUSEAL?
WITH ETHICS VIOLATION AND CAN HE
UNWHINE HIS RECUSEAL?
>> TO DO THAT AND MAKE ME
UNWHINE HIS RECUSEAL?
>> TO DO THAT AND MAKE ME
COMFORTABLE, I THINK DEVIN WOULD
>> TO DO THAT AND MAKE ME
COMFORTABLE, I THINK DEVIN WOULD
HAVE TO SORT OF DROP THE ROLE
COMFORTABLE, I THINK DEVIN WOULD
HAVE TO SORT OF DROP THE ROLE
THAT HE HAS PLAYED WHERE HE
HAVE TO SORT OF DROP THE ROLE
THAT HE HAS PLAYED WHERE HE
DECIDED TO VOTE HIMSELF TO THE
THAT HE HAS PLAYED WHERE HE
DECIDED TO VOTE HIMSELF TO THE
INVESTIGATION OF WHETHER THERE
DECIDED TO VOTE HIMSELF TO THE
INVESTIGATION OF WHETHER THERE
WAS IMPROPER OF UNMAS@/G.
INVESTIGATION OF WHETHER THERE
WAS IMPROPER OF UNMAS@/G.
WE HAVE AN ALL 702 AND THERE WAS
WAS IMPROPER OF UNMAS@/G.
WE HAVE AN ALL 702 AND THERE WAS
A SECTION OF UNMASKING ATTEMPTS
WE HAVE AN ALL 702 AND THERE WAS
A SECTION OF UNMASKING ATTEMPTS
OF THE PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION.
A SECTION OF UNMASKING ATTEMPTS
OF THE PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION.
THIS WAS A NEGATIVELY -- SADLY
OF THE PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION.
THIS WAS A NEGATIVELY -- SADLY
OF THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS, HE
THIS WAS A NEGATIVELY -- SADLY
OF THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS, HE
DEVOTED HIMSELF IN THESE THINGS.
OF THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS, HE
DEVOTED HIMSELF IN THESE THINGS.
THE FBI COMING FORWARD AND YOU
DEVOTED HIMSELF IN THESE THINGS.
THE FBI COMING FORWARD AND YOU
NEED TO DROP ALL OF THOSE AND
THE FBI COMING FORWARD AND YOU
NEED TO DROP ALL OF THOSE AND
WHAT I REGARD AS DISTRACTIONS
NEED TO DROP ALL OF THOSE AND
WHAT I REGARD AS DISTRACTIONS
AND THE WAY MIKE CONWAY STEERING
WHAT I REGARD AS DISTRACTIONS
AND THE WAY MIKE CONWAY STEERING
THIS.
AND THE WAY MIKE CONWAY STEERING
THIS.
>> OTHERS ARE SAYING YOU ARE THE
THIS.
>> OTHERS ARE SAYING YOU ARE THE
ONES THATS NOT IMPARTIAL.
>> OTHERS ARE SAYING YOU ARE THE
ONES THATS NOT IMPARTIAL.
HES TRYING TO INVOKE OTHER
ONES THATS NOT IMPARTIAL.
HES TRYING TO INVOKE OTHER
ASPECTS O FF THIS.
HES TRYING TO INVOKE OTHER
ASPECTS O FF THIS.
>> I TRY TO BE CAREFUL OF THE
ASPECTS O FF THIS.
>> I TRY TO BE CAREFUL OF THE
LANGUAGE I USE, I AM NOT SAYING
>> I TRY TO BE CAREFUL OF THE
LANGUAGE I USE, I AM NOT SAYING
THERE WAS COLLUSION.
LANGUAGE I USE, I AM NOT SAYING
THERE WAS COLLUSION.
I WANT TO MAKE SURE THERE IS
THERE WAS COLLUSION.
I WANT TO MAKE SURE THERE IS
IMPARTIALITY.
I WANT TO MAKE SURE THERE IS
IMPARTIALITY.
LETS TALK FOR A SECOND OF THIS
IMPARTIALITY.
LETS TALK FOR A SECOND OF THIS
UNMASKING THING.
LETS TALK FOR A SECOND OF THIS
UNMASKING THING.
I LOOKED AT ALL OF THE INTERCEPT
UNMASKING THING.
I LOOKED AT ALL OF THE INTERCEPT
THAT IS WERE UNMASKED AND HOW
I LOOKED AT ALL OF THE INTERCEPT
THAT IS WERE UNMASKED AND HOW
THEY WERE DONE.
THAT IS WERE UNMASKED AND HOW
THEY WERE DONE.
DO I THINK THAT PROCESS IS
THEY WERE DONE.
DO I THINK THAT PROCESS IS
BETTER AND SHARPER.
DO I THINK THAT PROCESS IS
BETTER AND SHARPER.
I WILL PARTICIPATE WILLINGLY IN
BETTER AND SHARPER.
I WILL PARTICIPATE WILLINGLY IN
AN EFFORT TO REFORM THAT.
I WILL PARTICIPATE WILLINGLY IN
AN EFFORT TO REFORM THAT.
WAS IT USED PROPERLY BY SAM
AN EFFORT TO REFORM THAT.
WAS IT USED PROPERLY BY SAM
POWELL AND SUSAN RICE?
Adam Schiff: Evidence of Russia collusion damning Trump is a Dragon Slayer not a politician - by Timothy Alberino Anonymous: Trump Refuses To Back CIA Full Panel: 'The world is watching' the Alabama Senate race | NBC News Meet The Press Rep. King: Worst Thing Trump Could Do Is Remove Mueller Trump-Russia Whiteboard #1: Intel Agencies and What Happened Why Donald Trump Jr. May Have Cited Attorney-Client Privilege | MSNBC Rep. Jordan presses Wray over Strzok, anti-Trump dossier Full Scott: If Moore wins, there will 'immediately be an ethics investigation' | Meet The Press Trump 'FEAR' By Mueller Moving Closer The Whole Truth About Trump's Campaign In Russia Probe

Full Himes Interview: 'We've seen a lot of contact' between Russia and Trump Campaign

Latest Posts