Full Scott: If Moore wins, there will 'immediately be an ethics investigation'

>> WHAT DID YOU THINK? >> I HAVE NO IDEA WHATS GOING TO HAPPEN ON TUESDAY.
>> I HAVE NO IDEA WHATS GOING TO HAPPEN ON TUESDAY. I THINK IT IS GOING TO BE REALLY
TO HAPPEN ON TUESDAY. I THINK IT IS GOING TO BE REALLY FRIGGIN CLOSE.
I THINK IT IS GOING TO BE REALLY
FRIGGIN CLOSE.
>> JOINING ME NOW IS SENATOR
FRIGGIN CLOSE.
>> JOINING ME NOW IS SENATOR
SCOTT.
>> JOINING ME NOW IS SENATOR
SCOTT.
>> WELCOME BACK TO "THEv■e< PRES
SCOTT.
>> WELCOME BACK TO "THEv■e< PRES
>> I AM FROM MIAMI.
>> WELCOME BACK TO "THEv■e< PRES
>> I AM FROM MIAMI.
YOU CALL FOR7X ROY MOORE TO MOVE
>> I AM FROM MIAMI.
YOU CALL FOR7X ROY MOORE TO MOVE
ON.
YOU CALL FOR7X ROY MOORE TO MOVE
ON.
YOU ARE NOT QUITE SURE WHAT YOU
ON.
YOU ARE NOT QUITE SURE WHAT YOU
SEE THE WHITE HOUSE WOULD DO.
YOU ARE NOT QUITE SURE WHAT YOU
SEE THE WHITE HOUSE WOULD DO.
THERE IS NO SENATE SEAT THATS
SEE THE WHITE HOUSE WOULD DO.
THERE IS NO SENATE SEAT THATS
WORTH ELECTING SOMEBODY ACCUSED
THERE IS NO SENATE SEAT THATS
WORTH ELECTING SOMEBODY ACCUSED
OF CHILD MOLESTATION.
WORTH ELECTING SOMEBODY ACCUSED
OF CHILD MOLESTATION.
NOW THE PRESIDENT HAS TURNED AND
OF CHILD MOLESTATION.
NOW THE PRESIDENT HAS TURNED AND
HES ALL IN FOR ROY MOORE.
NOW THE PRESIDENT HAS TURNED AND
HES ALL IN FOR ROY MOORE.
ARE YOU COMFORTABLE THAT THE
HES ALL IN FOR ROY MOORE.
ARE YOU COMFORTABLE THAT THE
LEADER OF YOUR PARTY ISQn ALL FO
ARE YOU COMFORTABLE THAT THE
LEADER OF YOUR PARTY ISQn ALL FO
ROY MOORE.
LEADER OF YOUR PARTY ISQn ALL FO
ROY MOORE.
>> THE NARC IS NOT ENGAGED IN
ROY MOORE.
>> THE NARC IS NOT ENGAGED IN
THE RACE.
>> THE NARC IS NOT ENGAGED IN
THE RACE.
THE FACT THE MATTER, IS OUR
THE RACE.
THE FACT THE MATTER, IS OUR
PARTY BIG ENOUGH TO HAVE FROM
THE FACT THE MATTER, IS OUR
PARTY BIG ENOUGH TO HAVE FROM
THE AGREEMENT.
PARTY BIG ENOUGH TO HAVE FROM
THE AGREEMENT.
WELL CONTINUE TO WORK FOR WAYS
THE AGREEMENT.
WELL CONTINUE TO WORK FOR WAYS
TO MOVE THIS COUNTRY FORWARD BY
WELL CONTINUE TO WORK FOR WAYS
TO MOVE THIS COUNTRY FORWARD BY
LOOKING AT THE ISSUES AND
TO MOVE THIS COUNTRY FORWARD BY
LOOKING AT THE ISSUES AND
POLICIES THATLL IMPROVE THE
LOOKING AT THE ISSUES AND
POLICIES THATLL IMPROVE THE
LIVES OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS.
POLICIES THATLL IMPROVE THE
LIVES OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS.
>> ROY MOORE,Gl IF YOU WINHE WIN
LIVES OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS.
>> ROY MOORE,Gl IF YOU WINHE WIN
COLLEAGUE THERE FROM COLORADO IS
>> ROY MOORE,Gl IF YOU WINHE WIN
COLLEAGUE THERE FROM COLORADO IS
FOR EXPULSIONS.
COLLEAGUE THERE FROM COLORADO IS
FOR EXPULSIONS.
WHERE ARE YOU ON THIS?
FOR EXPULSIONS.
WHERE ARE YOU ON THIS?
>> I THINK THE CONSTITUTION ROIR
WHERE ARE YOU ON THIS?
>> I THINK THE CONSTITUTION ROIR
REQUIRES US IF HE WINS, THERE
>> I THINK THE CONSTITUTION ROIR
REQUIRES US IF HE WINS, THERE
WILL BE IMMEDIATELY EFFICACY
REQUIRES US IF HE WINS, THERE
WILL BE IMMEDIATELY EFFICACY
o"QáURT(UION AND WELL HAVE A
WILL BE IMMEDIATELY EFFICACY
o"QáURT(UION AND WELL HAVE A
GREATER OPPORTUNITY FOR US TOWD
o"QáURT(UION AND WELL HAVE A
GREATER OPPORTUNITY FOR US TOWD
LOOK INTO ALL THE ISSUES AND
GREATER OPPORTUNITY FOR US TOWD
LOOK INTO ALL THE ISSUES AND
ALLEGATIONS AND PERHAPS EVEN
LOOK INTO ALL THE ISSUES AND
ALLEGATIONS AND PERHAPS EVEN
TALK WITH SOME OF THE FOLKS THAT
ALLEGATIONS AND PERHAPS EVEN
TALK WITH SOME OF THE FOLKS THAT
ARE WITNESSES.
TALK WITH SOME OF THE FOLKS THAT
ARE WITNESSES.
IT WILL GIVE US A CLEAR PICTURE
ARE WITNESSES.
IT WILL GIVE US A CLEAR PICTURE
AND I HAVE SAID SO FAR AS FAR AS
IT WILL GIVE US A CLEAR PICTURE
AND I HAVE SAID SO FAR AS FAR AS
I CAN TELL, THE ALLEGATIONS ARE
AND I HAVE SAID SO FAR AS FAR AS
I CAN TELL, THE ALLEGATIONS ARE
SIGNIFICANTLY STRONGER THAN
I CAN TELL, THE ALLEGATIONS ARE
SIGNIFICANTLY STRONGER THAN
DENIAL AND I AM GOING LET MY
SIGNIFICANTLY STRONGER THAN
DENIAL AND I AM GOING LET MY
DECISION BE MADE OF THE BREATH
DENIAL AND I AM GOING LET MY
DECISION BE MADE OF THE BREATH
OF INFORMATION AND EVIDENCE THAT
DECISION BE MADE OF THE BREATH
OF INFORMATION AND EVIDENCE THAT
I AM ABLE TO REVIEW DURING THE
OF INFORMATION AND EVIDENCE THAT
I AM ABLE TO REVIEW DURING THE
PROCESS.
I AM ABLE TO REVIEW DURING THE
PROCESS.
>> THERE IS A FEW CAMPAIGN
PROCESS.
>> THERE IS A FEW CAMPAIGN
ELEMENTS BEING USED HERE, DOUG
>> THERE IS A FEW CAMPAIGN
ELEMENTS BEING USED HERE, DOUG
JONES IS TRYING TO FIRE UP
ELEMENTS BEING USED HERE, DOUG
JONES IS TRYING TO FIRE UP
AFRICAN-AMERICAN VOTERS.
JONES IS TRYING TO FIRE UP
AFRICAN-AMERICAN VOTERS.
HE HAS THE MAILER OUT.
AFRICAN-AMERICAN VOTERS.
HE HAS THE MAILER OUT.
I AM GOING TO DESCRIBE IT TO
HE HAS THE MAILER OUT.
I AM GOING TO DESCRIBE IT TO
YOU.
I AM GOING TO DESCRIBE IT TO
YOU.
IT IS AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN MAN
YOU.
IT IS AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN MAN
WHO HAS A SKEPTICAL LOOK ON HIS
IT IS AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN MAN
WHO HAS A SKEPTICAL LOOK ON HIS
FACE AND IT SAYS THIS.
WHO HAS A SKEPTICAL LOOK ON HIS
FACE AND IT SAYS THIS.
WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THAT KIND
FACE AND IT SAYS THIS.
WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THAT KIND
OF CAMPAIGN LITERATURE?
WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THAT KIND
OF CAMPAIGN LITERATURE?
>> WELL, IT IS GETTING CLOSER TO
OF CAMPAIGN LITERATURE?
>> WELL, IT IS GETTING CLOSER TO
THE GUTTER HONESTLY.
>> WELL, IT IS GETTING CLOSER TO
THE GUTTER HONESTLY.
THE BIGGER ISSUE IS OF THOSE WHO
THE GUTTER HONESTLY.
THE BIGGER ISSUE IS OF THOSE WHO
BELIEVE ROY MOORE OR THOSE WHO
THE BIGGER ISSUE IS OF THOSE WHO
BELIEVE ROY MOORE OR THOSE WHO
DO NOT, THEY ARE TELLING
BELIEVE ROY MOORE OR THOSE WHO
DO NOT, THEY ARE TELLING
SIGNIFICANT FIND 71% AND VOTERS
DO NOT, THEY ARE TELLING
SIGNIFICANT FIND 71% AND VOTERS
SAY THAT THEY DO NOT BELIEVE
SIGNIFICANT FIND 71% AND VOTERS
SAY THAT THEY DO NOT BELIEVE
ALLEGATIONS.
SAY THAT THEY DO NOT BELIEVE
ALLEGATIONS.
SO REALLY A BIGGER QUESTION
ALLEGATIONS.
SO REALLY A BIGGER QUESTION
OTHER THAN THE QUESTION THAT YOU
SO REALLY A BIGGER QUESTION
OTHER THAN THE QUESTION THAT YOU
JUST PREPTSENTED TO ME IS HOW MA
OTHER THAN THE QUESTION THAT YOU
JUST PREPTSENTED TO ME IS HOW MA
VOTERS BELIEVE THE ALLEGATIONS
JUST PREPTSENTED TO ME IS HOW MA
VOTERS BELIEVE THE ALLEGATIONS
AND HOW MANY DO NOT AND WHEN YOU
VOTERS BELIEVE THE ALLEGATIONS
AND HOW MANY DO NOT AND WHEN YOU
SPLIT THAT, YOU FIND A TELLING
AND HOW MANY DO NOT AND WHEN YOU
SPLIT THAT, YOU FIND A TELLING
STORY.
SPLIT THAT, YOU FIND A TELLING
STORY.
THERE IS BEEN SOME CONCERN THAT
STORY.
THERE IS BEEN SOME CONCERN THAT
THE ELECTION OF ROY MOORE IS
THERE IS BEEN SOME CONCERN THAT
THE ELECTION OF ROY MOORE IS
JUST GOING TO SEND A LARGER
THE ELECTION OF ROY MOORE IS
JUST GOING TO SEND A LARGER
NEGATIVE MESSAGE OF WHAT THE
JUST GOING TO SEND A LARGER
NEGATIVE MESSAGE OF WHAT THE
REPUBLICAN PARTY STANDS FOR.
NEGATIVE MESSAGE OF WHAT THE
REPUBLICAN PARTY STANDS FOR.
YOU HAVE BEEN SOME BODY AS
REPUBLICAN PARTY STANDS FOR.
YOU HAVE BEEN SOME BODY AS
LEADER OF THE PARTY.
YOU HAVE BEEN SOME BODY AS
LEADER OF THE PARTY.
I WONDER IF COMMENTS LIKE THIS
LEADER OF THE PARTY.
I WONDER IF COMMENTS LIKE THIS
WHEN ROY MOORE SAID, IT WAS A
I WONDER IF COMMENTS LIKE THIS
WHEN ROY MOORE SAID, IT WAS A
GREAT TIME IN AMERICA AT THE
WHEN ROY MOORE SAID, IT WAS A
GREAT TIME IN AMERICA AT THE
TIME WHEN FAMILIES WERE UNITED,
GREAT TIME IN AMERICA AT THE
TIME WHEN FAMILIES WERE UNITED,
EVEN THOUGH WE HAD SLAVERY BUT
TIME WHEN FAMILIES WERE UNITED,
EVEN THOUGH WE HAD SLAVERY BUT
THEY CARED FOR ONE ANOTHER.
EVEN THOUGH WE HAD SLAVERY BUT
THEY CARED FOR ONE ANOTHER.
I THOUTGHT ABOUT THAT AND THIS
THEY CARED FOR ONE ANOTHER.
I THOUTGHT ABOUT THAT AND THIS
TWEET FROM STEVE KING.
I THOUTGHT ABOUT THAT AND THIS
TWEET FROM STEVE KING.
HE SAYS "DIVERSITY IS NOT
TWEET FROM STEVE KING.
HE SAYS "DIVERSITY IS NOT
STRENGTH."
HE SAYS "DIVERSITY IS NOT
STRENGTH."
STRENGTH."
STRENGTH."
STRENGTH."
SENATOR SCOTT, I KNOW YOU DONT
STRENGTH."
SENATOR SCOTT, I KNOW YOU DONT
WANT TO ASSOCIATE YOURSELF WITH
SENATOR SCOTT, I KNOW YOU DONT
WANT TO ASSOCIATE YOURSELF WITH
THAT.
WANT TO ASSOCIATE YOURSELF WITH
THAT.
IT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
THAT.
IT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
REPUBLICAN PARTY, WHAT DO YOU DO
IT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
REPUBLICAN PARTY, WHAT DO YOU DO
ABOUT THIS IN.
REPUBLICAN PARTY, WHAT DO YOU DO
ABOUT THIS IN.
>> WELL, VERY LITTLE THAT I CAN
ABOUT THIS IN.
>> WELL, VERY LITTLE THAT I CAN
DO ABOUT PEOPLE WHO SPEAK
>> WELL, VERY LITTLE THAT I CAN
DO ABOUT PEOPLE WHO SPEAK
IGNORANTLY AND YOU JUST HAVE TO
DO ABOUT PEOPLE WHO SPEAK
IGNORANTLY AND YOU JUST HAVE TO
CALL IT WHAT IT IS.
IGNORANTLY AND YOU JUST HAVE TO
CALL IT WHAT IT IS.
THE BOTTOM LINE IS BOTH WHEN
CALL IT WHAT IT IS.
THE BOTTOM LINE IS BOTH WHEN
STEVE KING AND TIM SCOTT ARRIVE
THE BOTTOM LINE IS BOTH WHEN
STEVE KING AND TIM SCOTT ARRIVE
IN THE COUNTRY, WE WERE CREATING
STEVE KING AND TIM SCOTT ARRIVE
IN THE COUNTRY, WE WERE CREATING
DIVERSITY BECAUSE OF THE NATIVE
IN THE COUNTRY, WE WERE CREATING
DIVERSITY BECAUSE OF THE NATIVE
AMERICAN ARE ALREADY HERE.
DIVERSITY BECAUSE OF THE NATIVE
AMERICAN ARE ALREADY HERE.
THATS A RIDICULOUS STATEMENT.
AMERICAN ARE ALREADY HERE.
THATS A RIDICULOUS STATEMENT.
ROY MOORE, I WAS SUPPORTING ROY
THATS A RIDICULOUS STATEMENT.
ROY MOORE, I WAS SUPPORTING ROY
MOORE BEFORE THE ALLEGATIONS AND
ROY MOORE, I WAS SUPPORTING ROY
MOORE BEFORE THE ALLEGATIONS AND
ALLEGATIONS REENFORCED WHY IT
MOORE BEFORE THE ALLEGATIONS AND
ALLEGATIONS REENFORCED WHY IT
WAS NOT THERE AND THE GOOD NEWS
ALLEGATIONS REENFORCED WHY IT
WAS NOT THERE AND THE GOOD NEWS
IS THANK GOD FOR LEADERS LIKE
WAS NOT THERE AND THE GOOD NEWS
IS THANK GOD FOR LEADERS LIKE
JOHN RATLIFF AND DIVERSE GROUP
IS THANK GOD FOR LEADERS LIKE
JOHN RATLIFF AND DIVERSE GROUP
OF YOUNG THINKERS WHOLL TAKE
JOHN RATLIFF AND DIVERSE GROUP
OF YOUNG THINKERS WHOLL TAKE
OUR COUNTRY IN A BETTER
OF YOUNG THINKERS WHOLL TAKE
OUR COUNTRY IN A BETTER
DIRECTION.
OUR COUNTRY IN A BETTER
DIRECTION.
LET ME ASK YOU WHAT HAPPENED
DIRECTION.
LET ME ASK YOU WHAT HAPPENED
THIS WEEK.
LET ME ASK YOU WHAT HAPPENED
THIS WEEK.
LET ME PLAY A LITTLE CLIP OF
THIS WEEK.
LET ME PLAY A LITTLE CLIP OF
WHAT SENATOR FRANKEN SAID DURING
LET ME PLAY A LITTLE CLIP OF
WHAT SENATOR FRANKEN SAID DURING
THAT SPEECH.
WHAT SENATOR FRANKEN SAID DURING
THAT SPEECH.
>> IT IS AN IRONY AND THE FACT
THAT SPEECH.
>> IT IS AN IRONY AND THE FACT
THAT I AM LEAVING WHILE A MAN
>> IT IS AN IRONY AND THE FACT
THAT I AM LEAVING WHILE A MAN
WHO HAS BRAGGED ON TAPE ABLE HIS
THAT I AM LEAVING WHILE A MAN
WHO HAS BRAGGED ON TAPE ABLE HIS
HISTORY OF SEXUALLY ASSAULTS SIT
WHO HAS BRAGGED ON TAPE ABLE HIS
HISTORY OF SEXUALLY ASSAULTS SIT
IN THE OVAL OFFICE AND THE MAN
HISTORY OF SEXUALLY ASSAULTS SIT
IN THE OVAL OFFICE AND THE MAN
REPEATEDLY PREYED ON YOUNG GIRLS
IN THE OVAL OFFICE AND THE MAN
REPEATEDLY PREYED ON YOUNG GIRLS
CAMPAIGNS FOR THE SENATE WITH
REPEATEDLY PREYED ON YOUNG GIRLS
CAMPAIGNS FOR THE SENATE WITH
THE FULL SUPPORT OF HIS PARTY.
CAMPAIGNS FOR THE SENATE WITH
THE FULL SUPPORT OF HIS PARTY.
>> DID YOU THINK IT WAS
THE FULL SUPPORT OF HIS PARTY.
>> DID YOU THINK IT WAS
APPROPRIATE FOR SENATOR FRANKEN
>> DID YOU THINK IT WAS
APPROPRIATE FOR SENATOR FRANKEN
TO RESIGN?
APPROPRIATE FOR SENATOR FRANKEN
TO RESIGN?
>> I THINK SENATOR FRANKEN
TO RESIGN?
>> I THINK SENATOR FRANKEN
THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT FOR HIM
>> I THINK SENATOR FRANKEN
THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT FOR HIM
TO RESIGN.
THOUGHT IT WAS IMPORTANT FOR HIM
TO RESIGN.
I WOULD TELL YOU THERE IS NO
TO RESIGN.
I WOULD TELL YOU THERE IS NO
QUESTION THAT HIS STATEMENT WAS
I WOULD TELL YOU THERE IS NO
QUESTION THAT HIS STATEMENT WAS
INCONSISTENT OF REALITY.
QUESTION THAT HIS STATEMENT WAS
INCONSISTENT OF REALITY.
THERE IS A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WITH
INCONSISTENT OF REALITY.
THERE IS A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WITH
THE PARTY WHO ARE NOT SUPPORTING
THERE IS A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WITH
THE PARTY WHO ARE NOT SUPPORTING
ROY MOORE.
THE PARTY WHO ARE NOT SUPPORTING
ROY MOORE.
WOULD YOU TALK ABOUT WHAT HE
ROY MOORE.
WOULD YOU TALK ABOUT WHAT HE
SAID ABOUT THE PRESIDENT, GIVEN
WOULD YOU TALK ABOUT WHAT HE
SAID ABOUT THE PRESIDENT, GIVEN
THIS MOMENT WE ARE IN, SHOULD
SAID ABOUT THE PRESIDENT, GIVEN
THIS MOMENT WE ARE IN, SHOULD
THE PRESIDENT ACCUSERSS ACCUSER
THIS MOMENT WE ARE IN, SHOULD
THE PRESIDENT ACCUSERSS ACCUSER
LAY OUT OF THEIR ACCUSATIONS AND
THE PRESIDENT ACCUSERSS ACCUSER
LAY OUT OF THEIR ACCUSATIONS AND
LET PEOPLE JUDGE FOR THEMSELVES?
LAY OUT OF THEIR ACCUSATIONS AND
LET PEOPLE JUDGE FOR THEMSELVES?
>> I THINK PEOPLE HAVE HAD THE
LET PEOPLE JUDGE FOR THEMSELVES?
>> I THINK PEOPLE HAVE HAD THE
OPPORTUNITY DURING THE 2016
>> I THINK PEOPLE HAVE HAD THE
OPPORTUNITY DURING THE 2016
ELECTION TO COME TO A DECISION.
OPPORTUNITY DURING THE 2016
ELECTION TO COME TO A DECISION.
THE ALLEGATIONS AND AK
ELECTION TO COME TO A DECISION.
THE ALLEGATIONS AND AK
ACONSTITUTION ARE APART OF THE
THE ALLEGATIONS AND AK
ACONSTITUTION ARE APART OF THE
CAMPAIGN.
ACONSTITUTION ARE APART OF THE
CAMPAIGN.
TREEG
CAMPAIGN.
TREEG
SHOULD PEOPLE VICTIMIZED HAVEym
TREEG
SHOULD PEOPLE VICTIMIZED HAVEym
OPPORTUNITY OF THEIR DAYS
SHOULD PEOPLE VICTIMIZED HAVEym
OPPORTUNITY OF THEIR DAYS
PRESENTING THEIR ISSUES, I HAVE
OPPORTUNITY OF THEIR DAYS
PRESENTING THEIR ISSUES, I HAVE
NO PROBLEM.
PRESENTING THEIR ISSUES, I HAVE
NO PROBLEM.
>> IF ROY MOORE IS ELECTED, YOU
NO PROBLEM.
>> IF ROY MOORE IS ELECTED, YOU
WILL HAVE ANOTHER INVESTIGATION
>> IF ROY MOORE IS ELECTED, YOU
WILL HAVE ANOTHER INVESTIGATION
INTO THIS, THERE IS NO PLACE TO
WILL HAVE ANOTHER INVESTIGATION
INTO THIS, THERE IS NO PLACE TO
HAVE ANOTHER INVESTIGATION
INTO THIS, THERE IS NO PLACE TO
HAVE ANOTHER INVESTIGATION
OUTSIDE OF CONGRESS ABOUT THE
HAVE ANOTHER INVESTIGATION
OUTSIDE OF CONGRESS ABOUT THE
PRESIDENT AND HISQ@■ ACCUSERS.
OUTSIDE OF CONGRESS ABOUT THE
PRESIDENT AND HISQ@■ ACCUSERS.
>> NO QUESTION.
PRESIDENT AND HISQ@■ ACCUSERS.
>> NO QUESTION.
>> IS THAT SOMETHING THAT SHOULD
>> NO QUESTION.
>> IS THAT SOMETHING THAT SHOULD
CHANGE?
>> IS THAT SOMETHING THAT SHOULD
CHANGE?
SHOULD YOU GUYS BE LOOKING AT
CHANGE?
SHOULD YOU GUYS BE LOOKING AT
THE PRESIDENTS ACCUSERS AS
SHOULD YOU GUYS BE LOOKING AT
THE PRESIDENTS ACCUSERS AS
WELL?
THE PRESIDENTS ACCUSERS AS
WELL?
>> ONCE AGAIN, I THINK IT IS TWO
WELL?
>> ONCE AGAIN, I THINK IT IS TWO
DIFFERENT SCENARIOS HERE.
>> ONCE AGAIN, I THINK IT IS TWO
DIFFERENT SCENARIOS HERE.
THE SENATE HAS RESPONSIBILITY
DIFFERENT SCENARIOS HERE.
THE SENATE HAS RESPONSIBILITY
OVER OUR MEMBERS.
THE SENATE HAS RESPONSIBILITY
OVER OUR MEMBERS.
I BELIEVE THAT IF HE WINS, YOU
OVER OUR MEMBERS.
I BELIEVE THAT IF HE WINS, YOU
WILL EXERCISE THAT
I BELIEVE THAT IF HE WINS, YOU
WILL EXERCISE THAT
RESPONSIBILITY.
WILL EXERCISE THAT
RESPONSIBILITY.
THE PEOPLE OF OUR COUNTRY HAVE
RESPONSIBILITY.
THE PEOPLE OF OUR COUNTRY HAVE
THE RESPONSIBILITY TO CHOOSE OUR
THE PEOPLE OF OUR COUNTRY HAVE
THE RESPONSIBILITY TO CHOOSE OUR
PRESIDENT.
THE RESPONSIBILITY TO CHOOSE OUR
PRESIDENT.
>> YOU HAVE BEEN CHOSEN TO BE ON
PRESIDENT.
>> YOU HAVE BEEN CHOSEN TO BE ON
THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE.
>> YOU HAVE BEEN CHOSEN TO BE ON
THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE.
ONE OF THE BIGGEST DISPUTE THAT
THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE.
ONE OF THE BIGGEST DISPUTE THAT
HAS TO DO WITH THE IDEA OF
ONE OF THE BIGGEST DISPUTE THAT
HAS TO DO WITH THE IDEA OF
RIDING OFF STATE AND LOCAL
HAS TO DO WITH THE IDEA OF
RIDING OFF STATE AND LOCAL
TAXES, LET ME AND YOU THIS, WHY
RIDING OFF STATE AND LOCAL
TAXES, LET ME AND YOU THIS, WHY
IS CORPORATIONS ARE GOING TO BE
TAXES, LET ME AND YOU THIS, WHY
IS CORPORATIONS ARE GOING TO BE
ABLE TO RIDE OFF STATE AND LOCAL
IS CORPORATIONS ARE GOING TO BE
ABLE TO RIDE OFF STATE AND LOCAL
TAXES BUT NOT VEGETABLE.INDIVIDU
ABLE TO RIDE OFF STATE AND LOCAL
TAXES BUT NOT VEGETABLE.INDIVIDU
DO YOU SEE THE FAIRNESS IN THAT?
TAXES BUT NOT VEGETABLE.INDIVIDU
DO YOU SEE THE FAIRNESS IN THAT?
>> THE QUESTION OF RIDING OFF
DO YOU SEE THE FAIRNESS IN THAT?
>> THE QUESTION OF RIDING OFF
ORDINARY BUSINESS EXPENSES AND
>> THE QUESTION OF RIDING OFF
ORDINARY BUSINESS EXPENSES AND
VERSES WRITING OFF OF STATE AND
ORDINARY BUSINESS EXPENSES AND
VERSES WRITING OFF OF STATE AND
LOCAL TAXES ARE TWO DIFFERENT
VERSES WRITING OFF OF STATE AND
LOCAL TAXES ARE TWO DIFFERENT
QUESTIONS.
LOCAL TAXES ARE TWO DIFFERENT
QUESTIONS.
ONE HAS TO DO WITH BUSINESS AND
QUESTIONS.
ONE HAS TO DO WITH BUSINESS AND
OTHER IS HOW WE TREAT THIS AND
ONE HAS TO DO WITH BUSINESS AND
OTHER IS HOW WE TREAT THIS AND
DO WE ALLOW -- WHAT I TELL YOU
OTHER IS HOW WE TREAT THIS AND
DO WE ALLOW -- WHAT I TELL YOU
US THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT WAYS
DO WE ALLOW -- WHAT I TELL YOU
US THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT WAYS
TO SWOEP THIS SOLUTION.
US THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT WAYS
TO SWOEP THIS SOLUTION.
WE HAVE CHALLENGES WITHOUT ANY
TO SWOEP THIS SOLUTION.
WE HAVE CHALLENGES WITHOUT ANY
QUESTIONS.
WE HAVE CHALLENGES WITHOUT ANY
QUESTIONS.
>> WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
QUESTIONS.
>> WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
I SEE THAT.
>> WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?
I SEE THAT.
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN WHEN YOU SAY
I SEE THAT.
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN WHEN YOU SAY
SWEDEN, EXPANDING DEDUCTIONS A
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN WHEN YOU SAY
SWEDEN, EXPANDING DEDUCTIONS A
LITTLE BIT OR WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
SWEDEN, EXPANDING DEDUCTIONS A
LITTLE BIT OR WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
>> A LOT OF CONVERSATIONS AROUND
LITTLE BIT OR WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
>> A LOT OF CONVERSATIONS AROUND
THE FABT THAT SOME OF THE BLUE
>> A LOT OF CONVERSATIONS AROUND
THE FABT THAT SOME OF THE BLUE
STATES WHERE THE TAXES ARE HIGH
THE FABT THAT SOME OF THE BLUE
STATES WHERE THE TAXES ARE HIGH
AND PROPERTY TAX ALONE WILL NOT
STATES WHERE THE TAXES ARE HIGH
AND PROPERTY TAX ALONE WILL NOT
BE ABLE TO USE THE $10,000
AND PROPERTY TAX ALONE WILL NOT
BE ABLE TO USE THE $10,000
POSSIBLE DEDUCTIONS SO ALLOWING
BE ABLE TO USE THE $10,000
POSSIBLE DEDUCTIONS SO ALLOWING
FOR INCOME AND PROPERTY TAXES
POSSIBLE DEDUCTIONS SO ALLOWING
FOR INCOME AND PROPERTY TAXES
THAT COULD COST ANOTHER
FOR INCOME AND PROPERTY TAXES
THAT COULD COST ANOTHER
$100 BILLION TO BE OPTIONS FOR
THAT COULD COST ANOTHER
$100 BILLION TO BE OPTIONS FOR
FOLKS IN THOSE STATES ARE BETTER
$100 BILLION TO BE OPTIONS FOR
FOLKS IN THOSE STATES ARE BETTER
FOR SOLUTIONS AND WE ARE K LOOLO
FOLKS IN THOSE STATES ARE BETTER
FOR SOLUTIONS AND WE ARE K LOOLO
AT WAYS FOR IT TO HAPPEN.
FOR SOLUTIONS AND WE ARE K LOOLO
AT WAYS FOR IT TO HAPPEN.
>> DOES THAT MEAN YOU ARE
AT WAYS FOR IT TO HAPPEN.
>> DOES THAT MEAN YOU ARE
RAISING CORPORATE RATES TO 20%?
>> DOES THAT MEAN YOU ARE
RAISING CORPORATE RATES TO 20%?
>> I AM HOPING THAT WE DONT
RAISING CORPORATE RATES TO 20%?
>> I AM HOPING THAT WE DONT
HAVE TO.
>> I AM HOPING THAT WE DONT
HAVE TO.
I AM LOOKING AT DEDUCTIONS AND
HAVE TO.
I AM LOOKING AT DEDUCTIONS AND
PROVIDING MORE RELIEF.
I AM LOOKING AT DEDUCTIONS AND
PROVIDING MORE RELIEF.
>> SWEETEN SAVORY IS THE TYPE OF
PROVIDING MORE RELIEF.
>> SWEETEN SAVORY IS THE TYPE OF
CUISINE THESE DAYS THAT
Full Himes Interview: 'We've seen a lot of contact' between Russia and Trump Campaign Meet the Press - Dec 10, 2017 | Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen. Tim Scott, Rep. Jim Himes Full Panel: 'The world is watching' the Alabama Senate race | NBC News Meet The Press "TRUMP IS CHANGING HIS STORY!!!" Chuck Todd CONFRONTS Trump Lackeys Corey Lewandowski & David Bossie Former Teammates Surprise Scott Frost In Weight Room Before Conference on Sunday 12-3-17 As Trump comes around to Roy Moore, what will the Alabama outcome mean for Senate Republicans? Thomas Train Stunts One America Exclusive Interview With Ala. Senate Candidate Roy Moore: Part Two BREAKING NEWS Out Of ALABAMA, Roy Moore Supporters OUTRAGED Republicans F0RSAKE DEC_ENCY To Support Roy Moore, "Witness The END 0F the Republican Party"

Full Scott: If Moore wins, there will 'immediately be an ethics investigation' | Meet The Press

Latest Posts