William Barr Improvises Role On Mueller Report Despite Clear Regulations | Rachel Maddow

click to begin

Youtube

COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND ALEXANDRIAOCASIO-CORTEZ.
ALEXANDRIAOCASIO-CORTEZ. HAVE A GOOD NIGHT.
HAVE A GOOD NIGHT. >>> HAPPY FRIDAY.
>>> HAPPY FRIDAY. THANKS FOR JOINING US THIS HOUR.
THANKS FOR JOINING US THIS HOUR. TURNS OUT, THE NEWS RULES OF
TURNS OUT, THE NEWS RULES OF THIS ERA WE'RE ALL LIVING
THIS ERA WE'RE ALL LIVING THROUGH HAVE NOT BEEN SUSPENDED.
THROUGH HAVE NOT BEEN SUSPENDED. IT IS FRIDAY NIGHT, AND
IT IS FRIDAY NIGHT, AND THEREFORE, PER UNSHAKABLE DEGREE
THEREFORE, PER UNSHAKABLE DEGREE FROM OUR GENERATION'S NEWS GODS,
FROM OUR GENERATION'S NEWS GODS, THINGS ARE, OF COURSE, A LITTLE
THINGS ARE, OF COURSE, A LITTLE NUTS IN TONIGHT'S NEWS AND WE
NUTS IN TONIGHT'S NEWS AND WE HAD A BUNCH OF BREAKING AND
HAD A BUNCH OF BREAKING AND DEVELOPING STORIES OVER THE
DEVELOPING STORIES OVER THE COURSE OF THIS EVENING.
COURSE OF THIS EVENING. TONIGHT FOR EXAMPLE, WE HAVE NEW
TONIGHT FOR EXAMPLE, WE HAVE NEW WORD THAT THE OVERSIGHT
WORD THAT THE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE IN CONGRESS IS
COMMITTEE IN CONGRESS IS PREPARING TO SUBPOENA THE WHITE
PREPARING TO SUBPOENA THE WHITE HOUSE PERSONNEL SECURITY
HOUSE PERSONNEL SECURITY DIRECTOR, SPECIFICALLY TO
DIRECTOR, SPECIFICALLY TO RESPOND TO ON GOING QUESTIONS
RESPOND TO ON GOING QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW THIS ADMINISTRATION
ABOUT HOW THIS ADMINISTRATION HAS HANDLED OR MISHANDLED
HAS HANDLED OR MISHANDLED SECURITY CLEARANCES.
SECURITY CLEARANCES. THAT IS A QUESTION THAT STARTED
THAT IS A QUESTION THAT STARTED OFF AS AN ACUTE ONE VERY EARLY
OFF AS AN ACUTE ONE VERY EARLY ON IN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
ON IN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION GIVEN THE CRIMINAL CHARGES THAT
GIVEN THE CRIMINAL CHARGES THAT WERE BROUGHT AGAINST TRUMP
WERE BROUGHT AGAINST TRUMP NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR MIKE
NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR MIKE FLYNN.
FLYNN. SIMILAR CONCERNS HAVE CONTINUED
SIMILAR CONCERNS HAVE CONTINUED MOST RECENTLY THROUGH THE
MOST RECENTLY THROUGH THE REPORTS THAT PRESIDENTIAL
REPORTS THAT PRESIDENTIAL SON-IN-LAW JARED KUSHNER WAS
SON-IN-LAW JARED KUSHNER WAS ACTUALLY BLOCKED FROM RECEIVING
ACTUALLY BLOCKED FROM RECEIVING A TOP LEVEL CLEARANCE BY CAREER
A TOP LEVEL CLEARANCE BY CAREER OFFICIALS BASED ON WHAT HE
OFFICIALS BASED ON WHAT HE REVIEWED BUT FOR SOME REASON,
REVIEWED BUT FOR SOME REASON, THOSE VIEWS, THAT DETERMINATION
THOSE VIEWS, THAT DETERMINATION HE SHOULDN'T GET A CLEARANCE WAS
HE SHOULDN'T GET A CLEARANCE WAS OVER RIDDEN BY THE WHITE HOUSE
OVER RIDDEN BY THE WHITE HOUSE AND HE WAS GIVEN A CLEARANCE
AND HE WAS GIVEN A CLEARANCE ANYWAY.
ANYWAY. SO THE WHITE HOUSE PERSONNEL
SO THE WHITE HOUSE PERSONNEL SECURITY DIRECTOR HAS BEEN OR IS
SECURITY DIRECTOR HAS BEEN OR IS GOING TO BE SUBPOENAED BY THE
GOING TO BE SUBPOENAED BY THE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.
OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. SOON AFTER WE GOT WORD OF THAT
SOON AFTER WE GOT WORD OF THAT SUBPOENA ON THE SECURITY
SUBPOENA ON THE SECURITY CLEARANCE ISSUE, TONIGHT, WE
CLEARANCE ISSUE, TONIGHT, WE ALSO GOT WORD THAT THAT SAME
ALSO GOT WORD THAT THAT SAME OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE LED BY
OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE LED BY CONGRESSMAN ELIJAH CUMMINGS,
CONGRESSMAN ELIJAH CUMMINGS, THEY ARE ALSO NOW SEEKING TO
THEY ARE ALSO NOW SEEKING TO SUBPOENA COMMERCE SECRETARY
SUBPOENA COMMERCE SECRETARY WILBER ROSS AND WILLIAM BARR
WILBER ROSS AND WILLIAM BARR SUBPOENAS THAT FOR BOTH OF THOSE
SUBPOENAS THAT FOR BOTH OF THOSE CAM ANYTIME OCHO
CAM ANYTIME OCHO CABINET OFFICIALS OVER WILBER
CABINET OFFICIALS OVER WILBER ROSS INTERVENEING TO ADD A
ROSS INTERVENEING TO ADD A CITIZENSHIP QUESTION TO IT.
CITIZENSHIP QUESTION TO IT. THIS IS A MATTER COURTS HAVE
THIS IS A MATTER COURTS HAVE REPEATEDLY SQUISHED COMMERCE
REPEATEDLY SQUISHED COMMERCE SECRETARY WILBER ROSS LIKE A
SECRETARY WILBER ROSS LIKE A BUG.
BUG. HE IS BEING SUBPOENAED BY
HE IS BEING SUBPOENAED BY CONGRESS ALONG WITH THE ATTORNEY
CONGRESS ALONG WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO ANSWER TO THEM ON
GENERAL TO ANSWER TO THEM ON THAT ISSUE, AS WELL.
THAT ISSUE, AS WELL. AGAIN, BOTH OF THOSE STORIES
AGAIN, BOTH OF THOSE STORIES DELIVERING TONIGHT, DEVELOPING
DELIVERING TONIGHT, DEVELOPING TONIGHT, BOTH OF THEM BREAKING
TONIGHT, BOTH OF THEM BREAKING LATE ON A FRIDAY, NATURALLY.
LATE ON A FRIDAY, NATURALLY. AND I THINK IN PART THIS IS OUR
AND I THINK IN PART THIS IS OUR LIFE NOW AND THE PACE IN WHICH
LIFE NOW AND THE PACE IN WHICH THINGS HAPPEN WITH THIS NEW ERA
THINGS HAPPEN WITH THIS NEW ERA WE'RE IN BUT FEELS LIKE IT'S
WE'RE IN BUT FEELS LIKE IT'S SPECIFICALLY OUR WAY WE
SPECIFICALLY OUR WAY WE CELEBRATE FRIDAY NIGHTS.
CELEBRATE FRIDAY NIGHTS. ALL RIGHT.
ALL RIGHT. WHAT IS IT ABOUT FRIDAYS?
WHAT IS IT ABOUT FRIDAYS? LAST FRIDAY, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU'LL
LAST FRIDAY, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU'LL REMEMBER THAT WAS WHEN WE GOT
REMEMBER THAT WAS WHEN WE GOT THIS LETTER FROM NEWLY PINTED LI
THIS LETTER FROM NEWLY PINTED LI GENERAL BILL BARR THAT MUELLER
GENERAL BILL BARR THAT MUELLER COMPLETED HIS WORK.
COMPLETED HIS WORK. MUELLER COMPLETED HIS WORK AND
MUELLER COMPLETED HIS WORK AND SUBMITTED A WRITTEN REPORT ABOUT
SUBMITTED A WRITTEN REPORT ABOUT WHAT HIS INVESTIGATION UNCOVERED
WHAT HIS INVESTIGATION UNCOVERED IN THE PAST YEAR AND TEN MONTHS
IN THE PAST YEAR AND TEN MONTHS THAT ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE
THAT ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL A WEEK AGO
ATTORNEY GENERAL A WEEK AGO TONIGHT, FRIDAY, JUST CONFIRMED
TONIGHT, FRIDAY, JUST CONFIRMED THAT MUELLER HAD FINISHED UP.
THAT MUELLER HAD FINISHED UP. IT CONFIRMED THAT MUELLER'S
IT CONFIRMED THAT MUELLER'S REPORT EXISTED.
REPORT EXISTED. IT CONFIRMED THAT MUELLER WAS
IT CONFIRMED THAT MUELLER WAS CLOSING DOWN THE SPECIAL
CLOSING DOWN THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE, BUT THAT
COUNSEL'S OFFICE, BUT THAT NOTICE FATHER OR MOTHER THEROM T
NOTICE FATHER OR MOTHER THEROM T DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING SUBSTANTIVE
DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING SUBSTANTIVE ABOUT THE CONTENT OF MUELLER'S
ABOUT THE CONTENT OF MUELLER'S FILINGS.
FILINGS. FOR THAT WE HAD TO WAIT TWO MORE
FOR THAT WE HAD TO WAIT TWO MORE DAYS UNTIL ON SUNDAY WE GOT
DAYS UNTIL ON SUNDAY WE GOT ANOTHER LETTER FROM ATTORNEY
ANOTHER LETTER FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL BARR AND THIS ONE
GENERAL BILL BARR AND THIS ONE ANNOUNCE WHAT HAD HE CALLED THE
ANNOUNCE WHAT HAD HE CALLED THE PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS OF
PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS OF MUELLER'S REPORT.
MUELLER'S REPORT. HE DELIVERED WHAT HE SAID WERE
HE DELIVERED WHAT HE SAID WERE MUELLER'S PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS
MUELLER'S PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS AND ALSO ONE OF HIS OWN, AND I
AND ALSO ONE OF HIS OWN, AND I THINK BECAUSE IT WAS VERY
THINK BECAUSE IT WAS VERY EXCITING TO HAVE ANY OFFICIAL
EXCITING TO HAVE ANY OFFICIAL CHARACTERIZATION WHATSOEVER OF
CHARACTERIZATION WHATSOEVER OF THE RESULTS OF MUELLER'S
THE RESULTS OF MUELLER'S INVESTIGATION, I THINK BECAUSE
INVESTIGATION, I THINK BECAUSE OF THAT EXCITEMENT THAT THERE
OF THAT EXCITEMENT THAT THERE WAS SOME CONTENT BEING
WAS SOME CONTENT BEING DESCRIBED, THE PRESS FOR A
DESCRIBED, THE PRESS FOR A LITTLE WHILE RAN WITH WHAT THE
LITTLE WHILE RAN WITH WHAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ASSERTED WERE
ATTORNEY GENERAL ASSERTED WERE MUELLER'S FINDINGS.
MUELLER'S FINDINGS. BUT WITHIN A FEW HOURS FOR SOME
BUT WITHIN A FEW HOURS FOR SOME PUBLICATION, CERTAINLY WITHIN A
PUBLICATION, CERTAINLY WITHIN A FEW DAYS FOR MOST, I THINK IT
FEW DAYS FOR MOST, I THINK IT STARTED TO DAWN ON EVERYBODY IN
STARTED TO DAWN ON EVERYBODY IN THE MAIN STREAM PRESS AND
THE MAIN STREAM PRESS AND EVERYBODY CONSUMING NEWS ON THIS
EVERYBODY CONSUMING NEWS ON THIS MATTER THAT WAIT A MINUTE, WE
MATTER THAT WAIT A MINUTE, WE DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE MUELLER'S
DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE MUELLER'S REPORT AT ALL.
REPORT AT ALL. MUELLER'S REPORT IS DONE AND WE
MUELLER'S REPORT IS DONE AND WE KNOW IT'S DONE AND WE KNOW IT
KNOW IT'S DONE AND WE KNOW IT EXISTS BUT WE HAVEN'T SEEN IT.
EXISTS BUT WE HAVEN'T SEEN IT. ALL WE HAVE IS WHAT WILLIAM BARR
ALL WE HAVE IS WHAT WILLIAM BARR SAID ABOUT IT AND THAT STATEMENT
SAID ABOUT IT AND THAT STATEMENT ON SUNDAY WAS IN IT SELF-SELF AN
ON SUNDAY WAS IN IT SELF-SELF AN THING.
THING. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE WAY
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE WAY HE'S WRITTEN THESE LETTERS AND
HE'S WRITTEN THESE LETTERS AND NOTIFICATIONS SOUND OFFICIAL.
NOTIFICATIONS SOUND OFFICIAL. THEY SOUND LIKE HE IS FULFILLING
THEY SOUND LIKE HE IS FULFILLING THE DUTY THAT IS EXPECTED OF HIM
THE DUTY THAT IS EXPECTED OF HIM AS ATTORNEY GENERAL AS WE EXPECT
AS ATTORNEY GENERAL AS WE EXPECT HIM TO DO, BUT THE ATTORNEY
HIM TO DO, BUT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS NOT SUPPOSED TO
GENERAL IS NOT SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF A
PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF A REPORT FROM A SPECIAL COUNSEL.
REPORT FROM A SPECIAL COUNSEL. THERE IS NOTHING IN THE SPECIAL
THERE IS NOTHING IN THE SPECIAL COUNSEL REGULATIONS THAT CREATES
COUNSEL REGULATIONS THAT CREATES AN EXPECTATION THAT AN ATTORNEY
AN EXPECTATION THAT AN ATTORNEY GENERAL WOULD TAKE ON THE ROLE
GENERAL WOULD TAKE ON THE ROLE OF INTERPRETING AND SUMMARIZING
OF INTERPRETING AND SUMMARIZING A SPECIAL COUNSEL'S REPORT IN
A SPECIAL COUNSEL'S REPORT IN HIS OWN WORDS, LET ALONE
HIS OWN WORDS, LET ALONE ANNOUNCING HIS DECISION WHETHER
ANNOUNCING HIS DECISION WHETHER OR NOT THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S
OR NOT THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S FINDINGS SHOULD PRODUCE ANY NEW
FINDINGS SHOULD PRODUCE ANY NEW INDICTMENTS.
INDICTMENTS. BUT NEVERTHELESS, THAT'S WHAT
BUT NEVERTHELESS, THAT'S WHAT BARR DID ON SUNDAY.
BARR DID ON SUNDAY. WE STILL DON'T KNOW WHY EXACTLY
WE STILL DON'T KNOW WHY EXACTLY HE DID THAT.
HE DID THAT. IT WAS -- I MEAN, IT WAS KIND OF
IT WAS -- I MEAN, IT WAS KIND OF HIM FREE SCALETYLING.
HIM FREE SCALETYLING. THIS WAS HIM MAKING UP HIS OWN
THIS WAS HIM MAKING UP HIS OWN DANCE MOVES, SHOWING WHAT HE
DANCE MOVES, SHOWING WHAT HE COULD DO NOW THAT HE HAD SEEN
COULD DO NOW THAT HE HAD SEEN MUELLER'S REPORT AND HE HADN'T.
MUELLER'S REPORT AND HE HADN'T. THAT UNEXPECTED PERFORMANCE FROM
THAT UNEXPECTED PERFORMANCE FROM BILL BARR, THAT RIFF HOW HE
BILL BARR, THAT RIFF HOW HE THINKS HE SHOULD RESPOND TO
THINKS HE SHOULD RESPOND TO MUELLER'S REPORT HAS GIVEN US
MUELLER'S REPORT HAS GIVEN US THIS WEIRD WEEK WE HAVE LIVED
THIS WEIRD WEEK WE HAVE LIVED THROUGH IN WHICH THE MUELLER
THROUGH IN WHICH THE MUELLER REPORT IS IN FACT FINISHED.
REPORT IS IN FACT FINISHED. IT'S BEING KEPT UNDER WRAPS AT
IT'S BEING KEPT UNDER WRAPS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. IT HASN'T BEEN GIVEN TO
IT HASN'T BEEN GIVEN TO CONGRESS.
CONGRESS. NONE OF IT HAS BEEN SHOWN TO THE
NONE OF IT HAS BEEN SHOWN TO THE PUBLIC BUT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
PUBLIC BUT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TOOK IT UPON HIMSELF TO DESCRIBE
TOOK IT UPON HIMSELF TO DESCRIBE WHAT HE SAID WAS IN IT AND WHAT
WHAT HE SAID WAS IN IT AND WHAT HE THINKS THE PRESIDENT SHOULD
HE THINKS THE PRESIDENT SHOULD NOT BE CHARGED ABOUT BASED ON
NOT BE CHARGED ABOUT BASED ON SOMETHING MUELLER FOUND THAT
SOMETHING MUELLER FOUND THAT WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO KNOW THAT
WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO KNOW THAT HE'S NOT EVEN DESCRIBING IN
HE'S NOT EVEN DESCRIBING IN DETAIL.
DETAIL. IT'S BEEN A WEIRD WEEK.
IT'S BEEN A WEIRD WEEK. THAT'S THE ASSERTION THAT WE GOT
THAT'S THE ASSERTION THAT WE GOT FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM
FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR AND BASED ON THAT THE WHITE
BARR AND BASED ON THAT THE WHITE HOUSE AND CONSERVATIVE MEDIA AND
HOUSE AND CONSERVATIVE MEDIA AND GOOD CHUNK HAVE BEEN CELEBRATING
GOOD CHUNK HAVE BEEN CELEBRATING ALL WEEK LONG THAT EVERYTHING IS
ALL WEEK LONG THAT EVERYTHING IS DONE NOW AND IT SURE IS A RELIEF
DONE NOW AND IT SURE IS A RELIEF AFTER THAT LONG INVESTIGATION TO
AFTER THAT LONG INVESTIGATION TO KNOW WHAT ROBERT MUELLER FOUND,
KNOW WHAT ROBERT MUELLER FOUND, AND WHAT ROBERT MUELLER FOUND
AND WHAT ROBERT MUELLER FOUND WAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
WAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING EVERYTHING IS FINE AND THE
EVERYTHING IS FINE AND THE REASON WE KNOW THAT MUELLER
REASON WE KNOW THAT MUELLER FOUND THAT IS BECAUSE THAT'S
FOUND THAT IS BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WILLIAM BARR TOLD US.
WHAT WILLIAM BARR TOLD US. HE SUMMARIZED MUELLER'S REPORT
HE SUMMARIZED MUELLER'S REPORT SO THAT MUST BE THE END.
SO THAT MUST BE THE END. WELL, NOW, TONIGHT, AGAIN, HAPPY
WELL, NOW, TONIGHT, AGAIN, HAPPY FRIDAY.
FRIDAY. NOW TONIGHT IT APPEARS THAT
NOW TONIGHT IT APPEARS THAT THERE SAY LITTLE BIT OF A PANIC
THERE SAY LITTLE BIT OF A PANIC IN THE DISCO BECAUSE NOW WILLIAM
IN THE DISCO BECAUSE NOW WILLIAM BARR HAS RELEASED YET ANOTHER
BARR HAS RELEASED YET ANOTHER UNEXPECTED TAKEN IT UPON HIMSELF
UNEXPECTED TAKEN IT UPON HIMSELF AD LIB FIGURING IT OUT AS HE
AD LIB FIGURING IT OUT AS HE GOES ALONG LET THERE APPEARS TO
GOES ALONG LET THERE APPEARS TO BE AN EFFORT BY THE ATTORNEY
BE AN EFFORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO TAKE BACK SOME OF
GENERAL TO TAKE BACK SOME OF WHAT HE SAID LAST WEEK WHICH
WHAT HE SAID LAST WEEK WHICH STARTED THIS WHOLE WEEK OF TRUMP
STARTED THIS WHOLE WEEK OF TRUMP IS EXONERATED ITS ALL OVER NEWS
IS EXONERATED ITS ALL OVER NEWS COVERAGE.
COVERAGE. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TONIGHT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TONIGHT SENT THIS LETTER ANNOUNCING THAT
SENT THIS LETTER ANNOUNCING THAT EVERYBODY MISINTERPRETED WHAT HE
EVERYBODY MISINTERPRETED WHAT HE SAID LAST WEEKEND IN THE LETTER,
SAID LAST WEEKEND IN THE LETTER, WHAT HE DID LAST WEEK IS BEING
WHAT HE DID LAST WEEK IS BEING TALKED ABOUT IN WAY HE DIDN'T
TALKED ABOUT IN WAY HE DIDN'T EXPECT THAT IS NOT AT ALL WHAT
EXPECT THAT IS NOT AT ALL WHAT HE MEANT AND WE SHOULD ALL KNOW
HE MEANT AND WE SHOULD ALL KNOW BETTER.
BETTER. QUOTE, I'M AWARE OF SOME MEDIA
QUOTE, I'M AWARE OF SOME MEDIA REPORTS AND OTHER PUBLIC
REPORTS AND OTHER PUBLIC STATEMENTS MISCHARACTERIZING MY
STATEMENTS MISCHARACTERIZING MY MARCH 24th SUPPLEMENTAL
MARCH 24th SUPPLEMENTAL NOTIFICATION.
NOTIFICATION. FOR EXAMPLE, CHAIRMAN JERRY
FOR EXAMPLE, CHAIRMAN JERRY NADLER'S MARCH 25 LETTER REFERS
NADLER'S MARCH 25 LETTER REFERS TO MY SUPPLEMENTAL NOTIFICATION
TO MY SUPPLEMENTAL NOTIFICATION AS A QUOTE FOUR-PAGE SUMMERY OF
AS A QUOTE FOUR-PAGE SUMMERY OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S REVIEW.
THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S REVIEW. MY MARCH 24th LETTER WAS NOT AND
MY MARCH 24th LETTER WAS NOT AND DID NOT PURPORT TO BE AN
DID NOT PURPORT TO BE AN EXHAUSTIVE RECOUNTING OF THE
EXHAUSTIVE RECOUNTING OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S INVESTIGATION
SPECIAL COUNSEL'S INVESTIGATION OR REPORT.
OR REPORT. AS MY LETTER MADE CLEAR, MY
AS MY LETTER MADE CLEAR, MY NOTIFICATION TO CONGRESS AND THE
NOTIFICATION TO CONGRESS AND THE PUBLIC PROVIDED PENDING RELEASE
PUBLIC PROVIDED PENDING RELEASE OF THE REPORT A SUMMERY OF ITS
OF THE REPORT A SUMMERY OF ITS PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS.
PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS. THAT IS ITS BOTTOM LINE.
THAT IS ITS BOTTOM LINE. I DO NOT BELIEVE IT WOULD BE IN
I DO NOT BELIEVE IT WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST FOR ME TO
THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST FOR ME TO SUMMARIZE THE REPORT OR RELEASE
SUMMARIZE THE REPORT OR RELEASE IT IN SERIAL OR PIECE MAIL
IT IN SERIAL OR PIECE MAIL FASHION.
FASHION. I'LL KEEP SENDING A LETTER BUT
I'LL KEEP SENDING A LETTER BUT DON'T SAY I'M SUMMARIZING IT
DON'T SAY I'M SUMMARIZING IT BECAUSE I'M DEFINITELY JUST
BECAUSE I'M DEFINITELY JUST DESCRIBING IT AND ONLY THE PARTS
DESCRIBING IT AND ONLY THE PARTS I WANT TO DESCRIBE, NOT ACTUALLY
I WANT TO DESCRIBE, NOT ACTUALLY GIVING YOU A SUMMERY.
GIVING YOU A SUMMERY. IT'S JUST BITS OF IT THAT I
IT'S JUST BITS OF IT THAT I THINK SOME PEOPLE MIGHT WANT TO
THINK SOME PEOPLE MIGHT WANT TO HEAR THAT I'M GOING TO CALL THE
HEAR THAT I'M GOING TO CALL THE BOTTOM LINE BUT IT'S NOT A
BOTTOM LINE BUT IT'S NOT A SUMMERY.
SUMMERY. IT'S ANOTHER THING THAT NOBODY
IT'S ANOTHER THING THAT NOBODY EVER ASKED ME FOR BUT THAT'S
EVER ASKED ME FOR BUT THAT'S WHAT I GAVE YOU AND YOU SHOULD
WHAT I GAVE YOU AND YOU SHOULD KNOW WHAT IT IS.
KNOW WHAT IT IS. FOR ALL OF THE INK AND BREATH
FOR ALL OF THE INK AND BREATH INVOLVED IN THE RUSSIA
INVOLVED IN THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION TRYING TO FIGURE
INVESTIGATION TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE CONTOURS OF THE MUELLER
OUT THE CONTOURS OF THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION, TRYING TO
INVESTIGATION, TRYING TO ANTICIPATE AND GAME OUT NOT ONLY
ANTICIPATE AND GAME OUT NOT ONLY WHAT HE MIGHT FIND BUT HOW IT
WHAT HE MIGHT FIND BUT HOW IT WOULD BE HANDLED WHEN HE
WOULD BE HANDLED WHEN HE ULTIMATELY SUBMITTED HIS
ULTIMATELY SUBMITTED HIS FINDINGS.
FINDINGS. I DON'T THINK ANYBODY IS GOING
I DON'T THINK ANYBODY IS GOING TO WIN THE KITTY FOR HAVING BET
TO WIN THE KITTY FOR HAVING BET THAT THE WAY THIS WOULD BE
THAT THE WAY THIS WOULD BE HANDLED IS THAT THE ATTORNEY
HANDLED IS THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WOULD GET THE REPORT AND
GENERAL WOULD GET THE REPORT AND AD LIB THE RESPONSE AND RANDOMLY
AD LIB THE RESPONSE AND RANDOMLY RELEASING HIS OWN ASSERTIONS
RELEASING HIS OWN ASSERTIONS ABOUT THE REPORT AND LITTLE HALF
ABOUT THE REPORT AND LITTLE HALF SENTENCE QUOTES FROM IT AND HE
SENTENCE QUOTES FROM IT AND HE WOULD INVENT AN EVOLVING SERIES
WOULD INVENT AN EVOLVING SERIES OF RULES FOR CHOOSING WHICH
OF RULES FOR CHOOSING WHICH PIECES OF THE REPORT HE MIGHT
PIECES OF THE REPORT HE MIGHT WANT TO KEEP TO HIMSELF AND NOT
WANT TO KEEP TO HIMSELF AND NOT SHOW ANYBODY ELSE.
SHOW ANYBODY ELSE. BUT HE DOES APPEAR TO JUST BE
BUT HE DOES APPEAR TO JUST BE DANCING HERE.
DANCING HERE. HE'S JUST BEEN, YOU KNOW, MAKING
HE'S JUST BEEN, YOU KNOW, MAKING IT UP AS HE GOES ALONG.
IT UP AS HE GOES ALONG. WHICH IS ODD IN PARTICULAR
WHICH IS ODD IN PARTICULAR BECAUSE THE REGULATIONS THAT THE
BECAUSE THE REGULATIONS THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS OPERATING
ATTORNEY GENERAL IS OPERATING UNDER HERE ARE CLEAR AND SHORT
UNDER HERE ARE CLEAR AND SHORT AND EASY TO READ.
AND EASY TO READ. I MEAN, THERE ARE REGULATIONS
I MEAN, THERE ARE REGULATIONS THAT SPELL OUT WHAT HE IS
THAT SPELL OUT WHAT HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE DOING HERE.
SUPPOSED TO BE DOING HERE. HE IS SUPPOSED TO NOTIFY
HE IS SUPPOSED TO NOTIFY CONGRESS UPON THE APPOINTMENT OF
CONGRESS UPON THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL COUNSEL.
A SPECIAL COUNSEL. WELL, HE WASN'T THERE WHEN
WELL, HE WASN'T THERE WHEN MUELLER WAS APPOINTED.
MUELLER WAS APPOINTED. SECONDLY, HE IS SUPPOSED TO
SECONDLY, HE IS SUPPOSED TO NOTIFY CONGRESS UPON REMOVING
NOTIFY CONGRESS UPON REMOVING ANY SPECIAL COUNSEL.
ANY SPECIAL COUNSEL. ROBERT MUELLER WAS NOT REMOVED
ROBERT MUELLER WAS NOT REMOVED SO HE DIDN'T NEED TO TELL THEM
SO HE DIDN'T NEED TO TELL THEM ANYTHING ABOUT THAT.
ANYTHING ABOUT THAT. THIRDLY AND LASTLY, HE'S
THIRDLY AND LASTLY, HE'S SUPPOSED TO NOTIFY CONGRESS UPON
SUPPOSED TO NOTIFY CONGRESS UPON CONCLUSION OF THE SPECIAL
CONCLUSION OF THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION AND TELL CONGRESS
INVESTIGATION AND TELL CONGRESS THAT THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S
THAT THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S INVESTIGATION HAS CONCLUDED AND
INVESTIGATION HAS CONCLUDED AND CONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE LAW,
CONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE LAW, THERE IS ONE OTHER THING HE'S
THERE IS ONE OTHER THING HE'S SUPPOSED TO TELL THEM, GIVE THEM
SUPPOSED TO TELL THEM, GIVE THEM QUOTE A DESCRIPTION AND
QUOTE A DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION OF INSTANCES, IF
EXPLANATION OF INSTANCES, IF ANY, IN WHICH THE ATTORNEY
ANY, IN WHICH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CONCLUDED THAT A
GENERAL CONCLUDED THAT A PROPOSED ACTION BY A SPECIAL
PROPOSED ACTION BY A SPECIAL COUNSEL WAS SO INAPPROPRIATE OR
COUNSEL WAS SO INAPPROPRIATE OR UNWARRANTED UNDER ESTABLISHED
UNWARRANTED UNDER ESTABLISHED DEPARTMENT PRACTICES THAT IT
DEPARTMENT PRACTICES THAT IT SHOULD NOT BE PURSUED.
SHOULD NOT BE PURSUED. THAT'S THE ONLY OTHER THING HE'S
THAT'S THE ONLY OTHER THING HE'S SUPPOSED TO FORMALLY NOTIFY
SUPPOSED TO FORMALLY NOTIFY CONGRESS OF.
CONGRESS OF. HE'S SUPPOSED TO TELL THEM A,
HE'S SUPPOSED TO TELL THEM A, MUELLER IS DONE AND B, DID
MUELLER IS DONE AND B, DID MUELLER WANT TO DO ANYTHING YOU
MUELLER WANT TO DO ANYTHING YOU BLOCKED HIM FROM DOING?
BLOCKED HIM FROM DOING? IF SO, YOU HAVE TO TELL
IF SO, YOU HAVE TO TELL CONGRESS.
CONGRESS. THAT'S WHAT THE REGULATIONS
THAT'S WHAT THE REGULATIONS SPELL OUT.
SPELL OUT. THERE IS NO PROVISION HERE THAT
THERE IS NO PROVISION HERE THAT WILLIAM BARR IS SUPPOSED TO
WILLIAM BARR IS SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE HIS OWN FOUR-PAGE
PROVIDE HIS OWN FOUR-PAGE SUMMERY.
SUMMERY. DON'T CALL IT A SUMMERY OF WHAT
DON'T CALL IT A SUMMERY OF WHAT IS IMPORTANT TO SAY ABOUT
IS IMPORTANT TO SAY ABOUT MUELLER
MUELLER MUELLER'S FINDINGS.
MUELLER'S FINDINGS. HE SAYS YOU SHOULDN'T CALL IT A
HE SAYS YOU SHOULDN'T CALL IT A SUMMERY.
SUMMERY. HE DIDN'T MEAN FOR IT TO BE
HE DIDN'T MEAN FOR IT TO BE CALLED A SUMMERY.
CALLED A SUMMERY. IT WAS MEANT TO BE INSTEAD A
IT WAS MEANT TO BE INSTEAD A SUMMERY OF THE REPORT'S
SUMMERY OF THE REPORT'S PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS.
PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS. THAT IS THE BOTTOM LINE.
THAT IS THE BOTTOM LINE. HE'S FREELANCEING THAT, TOO,
HE'S FREELANCEING THAT, TOO, NOWHERE IS HE ASSIGNED TO PICK
NOWHERE IS HE ASSIGNED TO PICK OUT THE BOTTOM LINE, NOWHERE IS
OUT THE BOTTOM LINE, NOWHERE IS HE ASSIGNED TO DESCRIBE THE
HE ASSIGNED TO DESCRIBE THE PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS OF
PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS OF ANYTHING TO ANYONE.
ANYTHING TO ANYONE. THERE IS NOTHING THAT THE
THERE IS NOTHING THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS SUPPOSED TO
ATTORNEY GENERAL IS SUPPOSED TO GIVE US ABOUT THE REPORT IN HIS
GIVE US ABOUT THE REPORT IN HIS OWN WORDS BECAUSE WE SOMEHOW ARE
OWN WORDS BECAUSE WE SOMEHOW ARE NOT ABLE TO DISCERN THE MEANING
NOT ABLE TO DISCERN THE MEANING OF THE REPORT ITSELF.
OF THE REPORT ITSELF. WE THE PUBLIC OR THE CONGRESS.
WE THE PUBLIC OR THE CONGRESS. SO HOW AND WHY DID THE ATTORNEY
SO HOW AND WHY DID THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DECIDE TO DO WHAT HE'S
GENERAL DECIDE TO DO WHAT HE'S BEEN DOING NOW FOR A WEEK WITH
BEEN DOING NOW FOR A WEEK WITH THE MUELLER REPORT?
THE MUELLER REPORT? HE'S WRITTEN UP THESE MULTIPLE
HE'S WRITTEN UP THESE MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS ABOUT IT NOW INCLUDING
DOCUMENTS ABOUT IT NOW INCLUDING WHAT APPEARS TO BE HALF OF A
WHAT APPEARS TO BE HALF OF A SENTENCE ABOUT THE PRESIDENT NOT
SENTENCE ABOUT THE PRESIDENT NOT BEING PROSECUTED FOR CONSPIREING
BEING PROSECUTED FOR CONSPIREING WITH RUSSIA.
WITH RUSSIA. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS DECIDED
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS DECIDED WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO SEE THE
WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO SEE THE OTHER HALF OF THAT SENTENCE.
OTHER HALF OF THAT SENTENCE. WE'VE ALSO GOT THE ATTORNEY
WE'VE ALSO GOT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OWN DECOLORATION, HE
GENERAL'S OWN DECOLORATION, HE THINKS THERE SHOULDN'T BE
THINKS THERE SHOULDN'T BE PROSECUTION ON OBSTRUCTION OF
PROSECUTION ON OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
JUSTICE. THAT'S NOTHING HE WAS ASKED FOR
THAT'S NOTHING HE WAS ASKED FOR OR EXPECTED TO PROVIDE AND
OR EXPECTED TO PROVIDE AND REQUIRED TO PROVIDE BUT THIS IS
REQUIRED TO PROVIDE BUT THIS IS WHAT HE'S DOING.
WHAT HE'S DOING. HE'S KEEPING THE MUELLER REPORT
HE'S KEEPING THE MUELLER REPORT TO HIMSELF AND MAKING THESE
TO HIMSELF AND MAKING THESE ANNOUNCEMENTS ABOUT IT.
ANNOUNCEMENTS ABOUT IT. AND AFTER HE WENT OUT ON THAT
AND AFTER HE WENT OUT ON THAT LIMB A WEEK AGO TONIGHT SAYING
LIMB A WEEK AGO TONIGHT SAYING THAT THERE SHOULDN'T BE
THAT THERE SHOULDN'T BE OBSTRUCTION PROSECUTIONS AND
OBSTRUCTION PROSECUTIONS AND HERE IS WHAT YOU GET TO KNOW
HERE IS WHAT YOU GET TO KNOW ABOUT THE PRESIDENT AND RUSSIA
ABOUT THE PRESIDENT AND RUSSIA AND HALF A SENTENCE AND SAYS
AND HALF A SENTENCE AND SAYS EVERYTHING IS FINE.
EVERYTHING IS FINE. AFTER GOING OUT ON THAT LIMB
AFTER GOING OUT ON THAT LIMB LAST SUNDAY, NOW, TONIGHT, WE'VE
LAST SUNDAY, NOW, TONIGHT, WE'VE GOT THIS LETTER WHERE HE TRIES
GOT THIS LETTER WHERE HE TRIES TO CRAWL BACK UP THE LIMB AND
TO CRAWL BACK UP THE LIMB AND HUG THE TRUNK.
HUG THE TRUNK. TONIGHT, QUOTE, I IN NO WAY
TONIGHT, QUOTE, I IN NO WAY INTENDED TO SUMMARIZE WHAT
INTENDED TO SUMMARIZE WHAT MUELLER HAS REPORTED.
MUELLER HAS REPORTED. QUOTE, MY MARCH LETTER WAS NOT
QUOTE, MY MARCH LETTER WAS NOT AND DID NOT PURPORT TO BE AN
AND DID NOT PURPORT TO BE AN EXHAUSTIVE RECOUNTING OF THE
EXHAUSTIVE RECOUNTING OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S INVESTIGATION
SPECIAL COUNSEL'S INVESTIGATION OR REPORT.
OR REPORT. WHEN I TOLD YOU I WOULD CONVEY
WHEN I TOLD YOU I WOULD CONVEY HIS PRINCIPLE CONONCLUSIONS, IT'
HIS PRINCIPLE CONONCLUSIONS, IT' WEIRD STUFF FROM THE ATTORNEY
WEIRD STUFF FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
GENERAL. FEELS LIKE A PANICKING
FEELS LIKE A PANICKING CONCLUSION FROM THE ATTORNEY
CONCLUSION FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TONIGHT.
GENERAL TONIGHT. I MEAN, ALL OF THIS COULD BE
I MEAN, ALL OF THIS COULD BE VERY EASILY CLEARED UP IF WE DID
VERY EASILY CLEARED UP IF WE DID KNOW WHAT MUELLER DID SAY, IF WE
KNOW WHAT MUELLER DID SAY, IF WE COULD SEE WHAT IS IN HIS REPORT.
COULD SEE WHAT IS IN HIS REPORT. AFTER A WEEK OF THE PRESIDENT
AFTER A WEEK OF THE PRESIDENT DECLARING THAT MUELLER'S REPORT
DECLARING THAT MUELLER'S REPORT TOTALLY EXONERATES HIM, I WILL
TOTALLY EXONERATES HIM, I WILL SAY MY ILLMPRESSION WHAT IS GOIN
SAY MY ILLMPRESSION WHAT IS GOIN ON HERE INSIDE THE JUSTICE
ON HERE INSIDE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AS I READ THIS, I
DEPARTMENT AS I READ THIS, I THINK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
THINK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR IS TRYING TO CHANGE
WILLIAM BARR IS TRYING TO CHANGE PUBLIC EXPECTATIONS ABOUT WHAT
PUBLIC EXPECTATIONS ABOUT WHAT ANYBODY IS ULTIMATELY GOING TO
ANYBODY IS ULTIMATELY GOING TO SEE FROM MUELLER'S FINDINGS.
SEE FROM MUELLER'S FINDINGS. I MEAN, LAST WEEKEND HE
I MEAN, LAST WEEKEND HE ANNOUNCED THERE WOULD BE TWO
ANNOUNCED THERE WOULD BE TWO CATEGORIES OF INFORMATION THAT
CATEGORIES OF INFORMATION THAT WOULD BE CUT OUT OF MUELLER OOS
WOULD BE CUT OUT OF MUELLER OOS RE
RE -- MUELLER'S REPORT.
-- MUELLER'S REPORT. FIRST TYPE OF INFORMATION THAT
FIRST TYPE OF INFORMATION THAT WOULD BE CUT OUT WAS OBTAINED BY
WOULD BE CUT OUT WAS OBTAINED BY THE GRAND JURY.
THE GRAND JURY. STICK A PIN IN THAT.
STICK A PIN IN THAT. WE'LL COME BACK TO THAT IN A
WE'LL COME BACK TO THAT IN A SECOND.
SECOND. SECOND TYPE, ANYTHING RELATED TO
SECOND TYPE, ANYTHING RELATED TO ON GOING MATTERS, INVESTIGATIONS
ON GOING MATTERS, INVESTIGATIONS OR OPEN CASES THAT REVIVED FROM
OR OPEN CASES THAT REVIVED FROM MUELLER'S INQUIRY.
MUELLER'S INQUIRY. WHY IT WOULD TAKE ATTORNEY
WHY IT WOULD TAKE ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR WEEKS TO
GENERAL WILLIAM BARR WEEKS TO CUT THAT INFORMATION OUT OF
CUT THAT INFORMATION OUT OF MUELLER'S REPORT, THAT'S A
MUELLER'S REPORT, THAT'S A STRANGE ASSERTION IN ITS OWN
STRANGE ASSERTION IN ITS OWN RIGHT.
RIGHT. IF WE'VE SEEN NOTHING ELSE, WE
IF WE'VE SEEN NOTHING ELSE, WE HAVE SEEN THAT AS A MATTER OF
HAVE SEEN THAT AS A MATTER OF COURSE IN HUNDREDS OF COURT
COURSE IN HUNDREDS OF COURT FILINGS OVER THE ENTIRE DURATION
FILINGS OVER THE ENTIRE DURATION OF THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION,
OF THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION, MUELLER'S TEAM MADE REDACTIONS
MUELLER'S TEAM MADE REDACTIONS SPECIFICALLY FOR THAT PURPOSE,
SPECIFICALLY FOR THAT PURPOSE, SPECIFICALLY TO NOT COMPROMISE
SPECIFICALLY TO NOT COMPROMISE ON GOING INVESTIGATIONS AND ON
ON GOING INVESTIGATIONS AND ON GOING CRIMINAL CASES ALL THE
GOING CRIMINAL CASES ALL THE TIME.
TIME. ALMOST EVERY SINGLE DOCUMENT,
ALMOST EVERY SINGLE DOCUMENT, ANY OF US IN THE PUBLIC REVIEWED
ANY OF US IN THE PUBLIC REVIEWED OVER THE COURSE OF THIS WHOLE
OVER THE COURSE OF THIS WHOLE GIGANTIC INVESTIGATION HAD STUFF
GIGANTIC INVESTIGATION HAD STUFF BLACKED OUT OR BLOCKED OUT
BLACKED OUT OR BLOCKED OUT SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE IT RELATED
SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE IT RELATED TO OTHER OPEN INVESTIGATIONS AND
TO OTHER OPEN INVESTIGATIONS AND OTHER OPEN CASES.
OTHER OPEN CASES. THIS IS A THING THAT MUELLER'S
THIS IS A THING THAT MUELLER'S TEAM DOES IN ITS SLEEP.
TEAM DOES IN ITS SLEEP. IT'S HARD TO BELIEVE THEY WOULD
IT'S HARD TO BELIEVE THEY WOULD LEAVE THE NEWLY APPOINTED
LEAVE THE NEWLY APPOINTED 68-YEAR-OLD ATTORNEY GENERAL
68-YEAR-OLD ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR TO HIMSELF TO
WILLIAM BARR TO HIMSELF TO FIGURE OUT WHAT MENTIONS IN THIS
FIGURE OUT WHAT MENTIONS IN THIS 400-PAGE REPORT MIGHT PERTAIN TO
400-PAGE REPORT MIGHT PERTAIN TO OPEN CASES.
OPEN CASES. THEY WOULDN'T LEAVE THAT TO BARR
THEY WOULDN'T LEAVE THAT TO BARR TO DO THAT.
TO DO THAT. MUELLER WOULD HAVE DONE THAT.
MUELLER WOULD HAVE DONE THAT. MUELLER'S TEAM WOULD HAVE DONE
MUELLER'S TEAM WOULD HAVE DONE THAT AS PART OF PRODUCING
THAT AS PART OF PRODUCING ANYTHING THEY HANDED OVER.
ANYTHING THEY HANDED OVER. THEY HAVE DONE THAT WITH EVERY
THEY HAVE DONE THAT WITH EVERY OTHER DOCUMENT THEY PRODUCED IN
OTHER DOCUMENT THEY PRODUCED IN THE COURSE OF THIS
THE COURSE OF THIS INVESTIGATION, YOU WOULD ASSUME
INVESTIGATION, YOU WOULD ASSUME THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO DO THAT
THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO DO THAT WITH THIS, TOO.
WITH THIS, TOO. WILLIAM BARR SAID IT'S TAKEN HIM
WILLIAM BARR SAID IT'S TAKEN HIM A LONG TIME BECAUSE HE HAD TO DO
A LONG TIME BECAUSE HE HAD TO DO THAT HIMSELF.
THAT HIMSELF. NOW TONIGHT, IN THIS NEW
NOW TONIGHT, IN THIS NEW SURPRISE LETTER FROM WILLIAM
SURPRISE LETTER FROM WILLIAM BARR, BARR IS IDENTIFYING TWO
BARR, BARR IS IDENTIFYING TWO ADDITIONAL CATEGORIES OF
ADDITIONAL CATEGORIES OF INFORMATION HE SAYS HE WANTS TO
INFORMATION HE SAYS HE WANTS TO CUT OUT OF THE MUELLER REPORT
CUT OUT OF THE MUELLER REPORT EVEN THOUGH HE DIDN'T MENTION
EVEN THOUGH HE DIDN'T MENTION THEM LAST WEEK.
THEM LAST WEEK. HE NOW SAYS IN ADDITION TO WHAT
HE NOW SAYS IN ADDITION TO WHAT HE TALKED ABOUT LAST WEEK, HE
HE TALKED ABOUT LAST WEEK, HE ALSO WANTS TO CUT OUT MATERIAL
ALSO WANTS TO CUT OUT MATERIAL THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY
THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY IDENTIFIES AS POTENTIALLY
IDENTIFIES AS POTENTIALLY COMPROMISING SENSITIVE SOURCES
COMPROMISING SENSITIVE SOURCES AND METHODS.
AND METHODS. AND HE SAYS HE WANTS TO CUT OUT
AND HE SAYS HE WANTS TO CUT OUT QUOTE, INFORMATION THAT WOULD
QUOTE, INFORMATION THAT WOULD UNDULY FRINGE ON THE PERSONAL
UNDULY FRINGE ON THE PERSONAL PRIVACY AND REPUTATIONAL
PRIVACY AND REPUTATIONAL INTERESTS OF PERTHIRD PARTIES.
INTERESTS OF PERTHIRD PARTIES. SO LET'S JUST TAKE THOSE IN
SO LET'S JUST TAKE THOSE IN TURN.
TURN. ON THE INTELLIGENCE STUFF, I
ON THE INTELLIGENCE STUFF, I MEAN, IT MAY BE THAT WHAT HE'S
MEAN, IT MAY BE THAT WHAT HE'S TRYING TO SAY THERE IS THAT HE
TRYING TO SAY THERE IS THAT HE NEEDS TO CUT OUT ANY CLASSIFIED
NEEDS TO CUT OUT ANY CLASSIFIED INFORMATION IN THE REPORT.
INFORMATION IN THE REPORT. WELL, YEAH, YOU KNOW, DUH.
WELL, YEAH, YOU KNOW, DUH. AGAIN, YOU DON'T RELEASE
AGAIN, YOU DON'T RELEASE CLASSIFIED MATERIAL TO THE
CLASSIFIED MATERIAL TO THE PUBLIC, RIGHT?
PUBLIC, RIGHT? AND MUELLER AND HIS TEAM KNOW
AND MUELLER AND HIS TEAM KNOW HOW TO DEAL WITH THAT.
HOW TO DEAL WITH THAT. IF THERE IS CLASSIFIED MATERIAL
IF THERE IS CLASSIFIED MATERIAL IN THE REPORT, MUELLER AND HIS
IN THE REPORT, MUELLER AND HIS TEAM WOULD HAVE TREATED
TEAM WOULD HAVE TREATED CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AS SUCH.
CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AS SUCH. IN ANY REPORT THAT THEY PROVIDED
IN ANY REPORT THAT THEY PROVIDED TO HIM OR ANYONE ELSE.
TO HIM OR ANYONE ELSE. IF THERE IS CLASSIFIED MATERIAL
IF THERE IS CLASSIFIED MATERIAL IN WHAT MUELLER FOUND AND
IN WHAT MUELLER FOUND AND REPORTED, THAT WOULD PRESUMABLY
REPORTED, THAT WOULD PRESUMABLY BE SEQUESTERED IN AN ANNEX TO
BE SEQUESTERED IN AN ANNEX TO THE REPORT.
THE REPORT. SO ONLY PEOPLE WITH NECESSARY
SO ONLY PEOPLE WITH NECESSARY CLEARANCES COULD REVIEW THAT
CLEARANCES COULD REVIEW THAT MATERIAL IN APPROPRIATE
MATERIAL IN APPROPRIATE SETTINGS.
SETTINGS. THEY WOULDN'T LEAVE IT
THEY WOULDN'T LEAVE IT PERSONALLY TO OLD WILLIAM BARR
PERSONALLY TO OLD WILLIAM BARR TO PUT ON READERS AND GO THROUGH
TO PUT ON READERS AND GO THROUGH IT LINE BY LINE TO FIGURE OUT
IT LINE BY LINE TO FIGURE OUT WHAT IN HERE SHOULD BE
WHAT IN HERE SHOULD BE CLASSIFIED.
CLASSIFIED. WHO MIGHT NEED A CLEARANCE TO
WHO MIGHT NEED A CLEARANCE TO SEE THIS STUFF?
SEE THIS STUFF? I GOT TO BUCKLE DOWN WITH THIS
I GOT TO BUCKLE DOWN WITH THIS REPORT.
REPORT. CLOSE THE DOOR.
CLOSE THE DOOR. HOLD MY CALLS.
HOLD MY CALLS. AND THEN ON TOP OF THAT, WHAT IS
AND THEN ON TOP OF THAT, WHAT IS THIS RANDOM NEW CATEGORY THAT HE
THIS RANDOM NEW CATEGORY THAT HE SAYS HAS TO BE CUT OUT OF THE
SAYS HAS TO BE CUT OUT OF THE MUELLER REPORT BEFORE EVEN
MUELLER REPORT BEFORE EVEN CONGRESS CAN SEE IT?
CONGRESS CAN SEE IT? IN FOR
IN FOR INFORMATION THAT WOULD INFRINGE
INFORMATION THAT WOULD INFRINGE ON PERTHIRD PARTIES.
ON PERTHIRD PARTIES. WHAT?
WHAT? THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS GOING
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS GOING THROUGH THIS REPORT BEFORE ITS
THROUGH THIS REPORT BEFORE ITS RELEASED FROM CONGRESS TO TAKE
RELEASED FROM CONGRESS TO TAKE OUT ANYTHING THAT SOME PEOPLE
OUT ANYTHING THAT SOME PEOPLE MIGHT FIND EMBARRASSING.
MIGHT FIND EMBARRASSING. I MEAN, WHERE DID THAT STANDARD
I MEAN, WHERE DID THAT STANDARD COME FROM?
COME FROM? WHO COUNTS AS A THIRD PARTY?
WHO COUNTS AS A THIRD PARTY? WHO COUNTS AS PEREVEN IN CLOSE
WHO COUNTS AS PEREVEN IN CLOSE FIRED SETTING.
FIRED SETTING. WHERE IS THIS IN THE
WHERE IS THIS IN THE REGULATIONS?
REGULATIONS? I MEAN, THE BOTTOM LINE HERE IS,
I MEAN, THE BOTTOM LINE HERE IS, YOU KNOW, IF AS BARR SAYS
YOU KNOW, IF AS BARR SAYS MUELLER'S REPORT IS TWO PARTS,
MUELLER'S REPORT IS TWO PARTS, THE RUSSIA ATTACK AND
THE RUSSIA ATTACK AND OBSTRUCTION, WE KNOW VERY LITTLE
OBSTRUCTION, WE KNOW VERY LITTLE ABOUT WHAT'S IN THE RUSSIA PART
ABOUT WHAT'S IN THE RUSSIA PART OF THE REPORT, RIGHT?
OF THE REPORT, RIGHT? ACCORDING TO BARR, HE SAYS THERE
ACCORDING TO BARR, HE SAYS THERE IS A LENGTHY DISCUSSION OF WHAT
IS A LENGTHY DISCUSSION OF WHAT RUSSIA DID.
RUSSIA DID. HOW THEY DID IT.
HOW THEY DID IT. WHEN IT COMES TO AMERICANS BEING
WHEN IT COMES TO AMERICANS BEING CAUGHT UP IN THE ATTACK, WE
CAUGHT UP IN THE ATTACK, WE DON'T KNOW.
DON'T KNOW. WE HAVE A SENTENCE FRAGMENT
WE HAVE A SENTENCE FRAGMENT ABOUT NOT CHARGING TRUMP OR HIS
ABOUT NOT CHARGING TRUMP OR HIS CAMPAIGN FOR PARTICIPATING IN
CAMPAIGN FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT ATTACK ON
THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT ATTACK ON THE ELECTION, BUT THAT'S ALL
THE ELECTION, BUT THAT'S ALL WE'VE GOT.
WE'VE GOT. OKAY.
OKAY. THERE, THAT'S HALF THE REPORT.
THERE, THAT'S HALF THE REPORT. ON OBSTRUCTION, WE ALSO REALLY
ON OBSTRUCTION, WE ALSO REALLY HAVE NO IDEA AS TO WHAT IS IN
HAVE NO IDEA AS TO WHAT IS IN THAT PART OF THE REPORT GIVEN
THAT PART OF THE REPORT GIVEN THAT THE ONE SENTENCE BARR
THAT THE ONE SENTENCE BARR QUOTES FROM IT SAYS THAT THE
QUOTES FROM IT SAYS THAT THE PRESIDENT IS AMONG OTHER THINGS
PRESIDENT IS AMONG OTHER THINGS NOT EXONERATED OF CRIMES RELATED
NOT EXONERATED OF CRIMES RELATED TO OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
TO OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. NOW, ON MUELLER'S FINDINGS IN
NOW, ON MUELLER'S FINDINGS IN THIS PART OF THE REPORT, IT'S
THIS PART OF THE REPORT, IT'S FAIR TO SURMISE THAT MUELLER
FAIR TO SURMISE THAT MUELLER PROBABLY DIDN'T WRITE A REPORT
PROBABLY DIDN'T WRITE A REPORT ABOUT ALL THE TIMES THE
ABOUT ALL THE TIMES THE PRESIDENT DEFINITELY DIDN'T
PRESIDENT DEFINITELY DIDN'T OBSTRUCT JUSTICE.
OBSTRUCT JUSTICE. RIGHT?
RIGHT? I MEAN, PRESUMABLY SOME OF WHAT
I MEAN, PRESUMABLY SOME OF WHAT WE'VE GOT THERE IN THE
WE'VE GOT THERE IN THE OBSTRUCTION PART OF THE REPORT
OBSTRUCTION PART OF THE REPORT IS A CATALOG OF PROBLEMATIC AND
IS A CATALOG OF PROBLEMATIC AND IN SOME CASES POTENTIALLY
IN SOME CASES POTENTIALLY CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR WHEN IT COMES
CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR WHEN IT COMES TO OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
TO OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. SO WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH
SO WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THAT INFORMATION?
THAT INFORMATION? THE PRESIDENT SAYS THE REPORT
THE PRESIDENT SAYS THE REPORT EXONERATES HIM TOTALLY AND HE'S
EXONERATES HIM TOTALLY AND HE'S BEEN SAYING THAT FOR A WEEK
BEEN SAYING THAT FOR A WEEK BASED ON WHAT WILLIAM BARR SAID
BASED ON WHAT WILLIAM BARR SAID PUBLICLY LAST WEEKEND.
PUBLICLY LAST WEEKEND. NOW BARR IS SITTING ON IT FOR A
NOW BARR IS SITTING ON IT FOR A FEW MORE DAYS REALIZING THIS IS
FEW MORE DAYS REALIZING THIS IS TAKING HOLD AND REALLY STARTING
TAKING HOLD AND REALLY STARTING TO RUN WITH THIS ON THE RIGHT
TO RUN WITH THIS ON THE RIGHT AND WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS
AND WHITE HOUSE AND REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS.
IN CONGRESS. I MEAN, THIS THING NOW KICKING
I MEAN, THIS THING NOW KICKING AROUND FOR A WEEK, THOSE
AROUND FOR A WEEK, THOSE EXPECTATIONS OUT THERE, THE
EXPECTATIONS OUT THERE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAVING RELEASED
ATTORNEY GENERAL HAVING RELEASED THREE DIFFERENT EVOLVING
THREE DIFFERENT EVOLVING STATEMENTS ABOUT WHAT HE'S DOING
STATEMENTS ABOUT WHAT HE'S DOING WITH THE REPORT AND WHAT HE
WITH THE REPORT AND WHAT HE MEANS WHEN HE DESCRIBES THE
MEANS WHEN HE DESCRIBES THE REPORT AND HOW HE'S GOING TO
REPORT AND HOW HE'S GOING TO FROM HERE ON OUT HANDLE THE
FROM HERE ON OUT HANDLE THE INFORMATION IN THE REPORT, IT
INFORMATION IN THE REPORT, IT JUST FEELS LIKE THIS IS TURNING
JUST FEELS LIKE THIS IS TURNING INTO A SCRAMBLE INSIDE THE
INTO A SCRAMBLE INSIDE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT.
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. IN RESPONSE TO THE ATTORNEY
IN RESPONSE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S NEWEST LETTER TONIGHT,
GENERAL'S NEWEST LETTER TONIGHT, JERRY NADLER RELEASED THIS.
JERRY NADLER RELEASED THIS. QUOTE, AS I INFORMED THE
QUOTE, AS I INFORMED THE ATTORNEY GENERAL EARLIER THIS
ATTORNEY GENERAL EARLIER THIS WEEK, CONGRESS REQUIRES THE FULL
WEEK, CONGRESS REQUIRES THE FULL AND COMPLETE MUELLER REPORT
AND COMPLETE MUELLER REPORT WITHOUT REDACTIONS AND ACCESS TO
WITHOUT REDACTIONS AND ACCESS TO THE UNDERLYING EVIDENCE BY APRIL
THE UNDERLYING EVIDENCE BY APRIL 2nd, WHICH IS TUESDAY.
2nd, WHICH IS TUESDAY. THAT DEADLINE STILL STANDS.
THAT DEADLINE STILL STANDS. AS I ALSO INFORMED HIM RATHER
AS I ALSO INFORMED HIM RATHER THAN EXPEND VALUABLE TIME AND
THAN EXPEND VALUABLE TIME AND RESOURCES TRYING TO KEEP CERTAIN
RESOURCES TRYING TO KEEP CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE REPORT FROM
PORTIONS OF THE REPORT FROM CONGRESS, HE SHOULD WORK WITH US
CONGRESS, HE SHOULD WORK WITH US TO REQUEST A COURT ORDER TO
TO REQUEST A COURT ORDER TO RELEASE ANY AND ALL GRAND JURY
RELEASE ANY AND ALL GRAND JURY INFORMATION TO THE HOUSE
INFORMATION TO THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AS HAS
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AS HAS OCCURRED IN EVERY SIMILAR
OCCURRED IN EVERY SIMILAR INVESTIGATION IN THE PAST.
INVESTIGATION IN THE PAST. THERE IS AMPLE PRESIDENT FOR THE
THERE IS AMPLE PRESIDENT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SHARING
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SHARING ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT THE
ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PROPOSES TO
ATTORNEY GENERAL PROPOSES TO REDACT.
REDACT. AGAIN, CONGRESS MUST SEE THE
AGAIN, CONGRESS MUST SEE THE FULL REPORT.
FULL REPORT. ON THAT ISSUE OF GRAND JURY
ON THAT ISSUE OF GRAND JURY MATERIAL AND THE ATTORNEY
MATERIAL AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ANNOUNCING THAT HE'S
GENERAL ANNOUNCING THAT HE'S GOING TO CUT ALL GRAND JURY
GOING TO CUT ALL GRAND JURY MATERIAL OUT OF MUELLER OOS'S RE
MATERIAL OUT OF MUELLER OOS'S RE AND NOT GOING TO ALLOW CONGRESS
AND NOT GOING TO ALLOW CONGRESS TO SEE THE MATERIAL, CHAIRMAN
TO SEE THE MATERIAL, CHAIRMAN NADLER IS RIGHT THAT THERE IS
NADLER IS RIGHT THAT THERE IS AMPLE PRESIDENT FOR EXACTRY RYLY
AMPLE PRESIDENT FOR EXACTRY RYLY KIND OF MATERIAL IN EXACTLY THIS
KIND OF MATERIAL IN EXACTLY THIS KIND OF INVESTIGATION.
KIND OF INVESTIGATION. GRAND JURY INFORMATION DOESN'T
GRAND JURY INFORMATION DOESN'T GET RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC.
GET RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC. IF IT DOES GET RELEASED TO THE
IF IT DOES GET RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC, IT'S DECADES DOWN THE
PUBLIC, IT'S DECADES DOWN THE LINE, RIGHT?
LINE, RIGHT? HISTORICALLY IT PREFREQUENTLY DO
HISTORICALLY IT PREFREQUENTLY DO GET RELEASEED TO CONGRESSESASED
GET RELEASEED TO CONGRESSESASED THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS IN THE PAST,
THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS IN THE PAST, IN THE KEN STARR INVESTIGATION
IN THE KEN STARR INVESTIGATION INTO THE WHITE WATER REAL ESTATE
INTO THE WHITE WATER REAL ESTATE DEAL AND THE PRESIDENT'S AFFAIR
DEAL AND THE PRESIDENT'S AFFAIR WITH THE WHITE HOUSE INTERN.
WITH THE WHITE HOUSE INTERN. RIGHT?
RIGHT? IN THE LEON JAWARSKI
IN THE LEON JAWARSKI INVESTIGATION.
INVESTIGATION. PROSECUTORS MADE THAT REQUEST TO
PROSECUTORS MADE THAT REQUEST TO A FEDERAL JUDGE SO A JUDGE WOULD
A FEDERAL JUDGE SO A JUDGE WOULD ISSUE A COURT ORDER ALLOWING
ISSUE A COURT ORDER ALLOWING THEM TO CONVEY GRAND JURY
THEM TO CONVEY GRAND JURY INFORMATION TO CONGRESS, AND IN
INFORMATION TO CONGRESS, AND IN THOSE INSTANCES, THE JUDGE SAID
THOSE INSTANCES, THE JUDGE SAID YES AND THE INFORMATION WENT TO
YES AND THE INFORMATION WENT TO CONGRESS.
CONGRESS. HERE, JERRY NADLER IS ASKING FOR
HERE, JERRY NADLER IS ASKING FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR TO
ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR TO WORK WITH HIM AND MAKE THAT
WORK WITH HIM AND MAKE THAT REQUEST TO THE JUDGE NOW SO THE
REQUEST TO THE JUDGE NOW SO THE GRAND JURY INFORMATION IN THIS
GRAND JURY INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT CAN GO TO CONGRESS LIKE
REPORT CAN GO TO CONGRESS LIKE IT HAS IN ALL PREVIOUS REPORTS
IT HAS IN ALL PREVIOUS REPORTS LIKE THIS.
LIKE THIS. JERRY NADLER IS SORT OF
JERRY NADLER IS SORT OF REITERATING THAT POINT TONIGHT,
REITERATING THAT POINT TONIGHT, RAISING THE QUESTION OF WHETHER
RAISING THE QUESTION OF WHETHER OR NOT ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM
OR NOT ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR IS REFUSING TO DO THAT,
BARR IS REFUSING TO DO THAT, WHETHER HE'S REFUSING TO ASK A
WHETHER HE'S REFUSING TO ASK A COURT TO RELEASE GRAND JURY
COURT TO RELEASE GRAND JURY INFORMATION TO CONGRESS IN THE
INFORMATION TO CONGRESS IN THE SAME WAY IT'S BEEN RELEASED IN
SAME WAY IT'S BEEN RELEASED IN ALL PREVIOUS REPORTS LIKE THIS.
ALL PREVIOUS REPORTS LIKE THIS. IF HE IS REFUSING TO MAKE THAT
IF HE IS REFUSING TO MAKE THAT REQUEST OF A COURT, WHY IS HE
REQUEST OF A COURT, WHY IS HE REFUSING?
REFUSING? IF HE IS REPUSINGFUSEING TO MAKE
IF HE IS REPUSINGFUSEING TO MAKE REQUEST TO CONGRESS, IF HE'S
REQUEST TO CONGRESS, IF HE'S REFUSEING TO DO IT, ROBERT
REFUSEING TO DO IT, ROBERT MUELLER RIGHT NOW IS STILL ON
MUELLER RIGHT NOW IS STILL ON THE JOB.
THE JOB. CAN ROBERT MUELLER MAKE THAT
CAN ROBERT MUELLER MAKE THAT REQUEST OF THE COURT?
REQUEST OF THE COURT? WOULD WILLIAM BARR AS ATTORNEY
WOULD WILLIAM BARR AS ATTORNEY GENERAL STOP MUELLER FROM MAKING
GENERAL STOP MUELLER FROM MAKING THAT REQUEST TO LEASE THE
THAT REQUEST TO LEASE THE MATERIAL TO THE CONGRESS?
MATERIAL TO THE CONGRESS? I MEAN, I ASK AT THAT LEVEL OF
I MEAN, I ASK AT THAT LEVEL OF DETAIL BECAUSE THE ATTORNEY
DETAIL BECAUSE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DOES APPEAR TO BE MAKING
GENERAL DOES APPEAR TO BE MAKING THIS ALL UP AS HE GOES ALONG.
THIS ALL UP AS HE GOES ALONG. AS OF TONIGHT HE'S TRYING TO
AS OF TONIGHT HE'S TRYING TO CLEAN UP WHAT HE'S DONE IN THE
CLEAN UP WHAT HE'S DONE IN THE PAST WEEK SINCE HE FIRST GOT
PAST WEEK SINCE HE FIRST GOT MUELLER'S REPORT.
MUELLER'S REPORT. WHAT GOVERNS WHAT WILLIAM BARR
WHAT GOVERNS WHAT WILLIAM BARR IS DOING HERE?
IS DOING HERE? WHY DID HE RELEASE WHAT HE'S
WHY DID HE RELEASE WHAT HE'S CALLING PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS
CALLING PRINCIPLE CONCLUSIONS THAT HE SAYS SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN
THAT HE SAYS SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS A MUMSUMMERY OF WHAT MUELLER
AS A MUMSUMMERY OF WHAT MUELLER SAID.
SAID. WHAT'S THE BASIS OF REDACTIONS
WHAT'S THE BASIS OF REDACTIONS HE SAYS MUST BE MADE TO THE
HE SAYS MUST BE MADE TO THE MUELLER REPORT BEFORE ANYBODY IS
MUELLER REPORT BEFORE ANYBODY IS ALLOWED TO SEE IT?
ALLOWED TO SEE IT? IN PART BECAUSE HE NEEDS TO
IN PART BECAUSE HE NEEDS TO PROTECT THIRD PARTIES
PROTECT THIRD PARTIES REPUTATIONAL INTERESTS.
REPUTATIONAL INTERESTS. I MEAN, IF HE'S REFUSING TO ASK
I MEAN, IF HE'S REFUSING TO ASK THE COURTS TO RELEASE GRAND JURY
THE COURTS TO RELEASE GRAND JURY INFORMATION TO CONGRESS, I MEAN,
INFORMATION TO CONGRESS, I MEAN, CAN MUELLER DO THAT IF BARR WILL
CAN MUELLER DO THAT IF BARR WILL NOT?
NOT? IF BARR WON'T LET MUELLER DO IT,
IF BARR WON'T LET MUELLER DO IT, WHAT WILL HAPPEN WHEN THE
WHAT WILL HAPPEN WHEN THE COMMITTEE IN CONGRESS INEVITABLY
COMMITTEE IN CONGRESS INEVITABLY GOES TO THE COURT THEMSELVES AND
GOES TO THE COURT THEMSELVES AND GOES AROUND THE JUSTICE
GOES AROUND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO DO SO WHEN THEY
DEPARTMENT TO DO SO WHEN THEY ASK A JUDGE TO CLEAR THEM TO
ASK A JUDGE TO CLEAR THEM TO OBTAIN THE GRAND JURY MATERIAL?
OBTAIN THE GRAND JURY MATERIAL? AND WHAT DO YOU DO IF YOU'RE THE
AND WHAT DO YOU DO IF YOU'RE THE CHAIRMAN OF THE INTELLIGENCE
CHAIRMAN OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE.
COMMITTEE. THEY GET ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED
THEY GET ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION, EVEN VERY SENSITIVE
INFORMATION, EVEN VERY SENSITIVE SOURCES AND METHODS TYPE
SOURCES AND METHODS TYPE INTELLIGENCE MATERIAL GETS
INTELLIGENCE MATERIAL GETS BRIEFED TO THE INTELLIGENCE
BRIEFED TO THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE OR AT LEAST TO THE
COMMITTEE OR AT LEAST TO THE LEADERSHIP AND SO-CALLED GANG OF
LEADERSHIP AND SO-CALLED GANG OF EIGHT FOR PARTICULAR LICENSETIVE
EIGHT FOR PARTICULAR LICENSETIVE MATTERS.
MATTERS. I MEAN, NOTHING GETS REDACTED
I MEAN, NOTHING GETS REDACTED FROM YOU IF IT'S INTELLIGENCE
FROM YOU IF IT'S INTELLIGENCE RELATED INFORMATION.
RELATED INFORMATION. SO IF YOU'RE THE INTELLIGENCE
SO IF YOU'RE THE INTELLIGENCE CHAIRMAN, WHAT DO YOU DO WITH
CHAIRMAN, WHAT DO YOU DO WITH THIS LETTER TONIGHT?
THIS LETTER TONIGHT? UPON BEING INFORMED THAT AS OF
UPON BEING INFORMED THAT AS OF TONIGHT, THE SENSITIVE
TONIGHT, THE SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE STUFF WILL BE CUT
INTELLIGENCE STUFF WILL BE CUT OUT BEFORE YOU'RE ALLOWED TO SEE
OUT BEFORE YOU'RE ALLOWED TO SEE IT.
IT. THAT WASN'T TRUE AS OF LAST
THAT WASN'T TRUE AS OF LAST WEEKEND BUT APPARENTLY THAT'S
WEEKEND BUT APPARENTLY THAT'S TRUE AS OF TONIGHT.
TRUE AS OF TONIGHT. THAT'S NOT HOW THIS WORKS, NONE
THAT'S NOT HOW THIS WORKS, NONE OF THIS IS HOW THIS IS SUPPOSED

Adam Schiff: Barr Memo Claim On Need For Obstruction Decision 'Flimsy' | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC Trump Aide Who Cooperated: 'Bad Things' Coming In Mueller Report | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC Mueller report: Trump attorney Jay Sekulow slams probes as "waste of money" Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Explains Why The Green New Deal Is About More Than Climate | All In | MSNBC Answer Is In The Appendices: Barr, Congress He Expects To Release Mueller Report | Deadline | MSNBC Trump talks Mueller report fallout in 'Hannity' exclusive | FULL Sean Hannity 3/29/19 | Breaking Fox News Today March 29, 2019 Donald Trump slams political enemies | ITV News News Wrap: Barr says he'll release version of Mueller report in April The Mueller Report Has NOT Been Released. What's Being Hidden?

William Barr Improvises Role On Mueller Report Despite Clear Regulations | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

Latest Posts